Upstream commit: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=a385f10480ecf8a39612b7e12fd28c7349702041 Perhaps not super important, but a good grab, I think.
I'll try to remember this for the next version bump. I don't see any strong reason for a backport.
(In reply to Mike Gilbert from comment #1) > I'll try to remember this for the next version bump. I don't see any strong > reason for a backport. Yeah, I thought it's not a huge priority, but then there's some desire to get rid of the old libfuse, and the commit is in the upstream repo, but considering how rarely they release new versions... you know. It's the only reason I filed the bug, really, it could be years till it releases and hits ::gentoo. At least if there's an urgent push to move away from sys-fs/fuse:0, the info is in the bugzilla how to do it quickly.
Looks like we forgot to do this for 2.12.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=287b32c46ef4a274fe2ae132f5de1af413ffc84a commit 287b32c46ef4a274fe2ae132f5de1af413ffc84a Author: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-12-25 20:55:09 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-12-26 21:24:12 +0000 sys-boot/grub: Use libsdl2 instead of libsdl Solves this configure error with sdl enabled: checking for SDL2... yes configure: error: SDL support for grub-emu was explicitly requested but can't be compiled (disabled by sdl2) Also fix the fuse dependency to use fuse:3. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/880377 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/920699 Signed-off-by: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/34475 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sys-boot/grub/{grub-2.12.ebuild => grub-2.12-r1.ebuild} | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
