Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 857660 - sci-libs/rocBLAS-5.0.2-r1 fails to compile: shared_ptr_base.h:196:22: error: use of undeclared identifier noinline; did you mean inline?
Summary: sci-libs/rocBLAS-5.0.2-r1 fails to compile: shared_ptr_base.h:196:22: error: ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 857126
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Science Related Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: gcc-12
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2022-07-11 17:45 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2022-08-23 10:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-07-11 17:45:58 UTC 
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: sci-libs/rocBLAS-5.0.2-r1 fails to compile.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci)
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2022-07-11 17:46:08 UTC 
Error(s) that match a know pattern in addition to what has been reported in the summary:


FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_axpy_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_axpy_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_axpy_ex_kernels.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_axpy_strided_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_dot_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_dot_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_dot_strided_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_gemm_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_gemm_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_gemm_ext2.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_gemm_strided_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_nrm2_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_nrm2_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_nrm2_strided_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_rot_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_rot_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_rot_ex_kernels.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_rot_strided_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_scal_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_scal_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_scal_ex_kernels.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_scal_strided_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_trmm_outofplace_batched.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_trmm_outofplace.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_trsv_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_trsv_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: library/src/CMakeFiles/rocblas.dir/blas_ex/rocblas_trsv_strided_batched_ex.cpp.o 
FAILED: Tensile/lib/CMakeFiles/TensileHost.dir/source/hip/HipSolutionAdapter.cpp.o 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.1.1/include/g++-v12/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:196:22: error: use of undeclared identifier 'noinline'; did you mean 'inline'?
Comment 3 Robert Nelson 2022-07-29 21:10:44 UTC 
This is caused by using gcc-12. I was able to install rocBLAS-5.0.2-r1 by masking gcc-12 as mentioned in a similar bug report here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/857126
Comment 4 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2022-08-23 10:08:54 UTC 
Thank you Robert for pointing this out!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 857126 ***