84766 – dev-java/java-sdk-docs shouldn't be hard masked

Bug 84766 - dev-java/java-sdk-docs shouldn't be hard masked

Summary: dev-java/java-sdk-docs shouldn't be hard masked

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 81409

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Java team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2005-03-10 10:16 UTC by David Grant
Modified:	2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description David Grant 2005-03-10 10:16:54 UTC

It's just some docs right? Why hard mask it? The reason given is for sun-jdk-1.5 not docs. Fine to mask sun-jdk but no reason given for masking java-sdk-docs so it should be unmasked

bash-2.05b# emerge -vp =dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.5.0

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies   
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.5.0" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.5.0 (masked by: package.mask)
# <axxo@gentoo.org>
# If you use 1.5 you will get sandbox violations on /dev/random
# please don't file any more bugs on that issue 
#
# 1.5 defaults too -target 1.5 making downgrading to a 1.4(/1.3)
# impossible, see bug 65937 for more information/discussion


For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or 
section 2.2 "Software Availability" in the Gentoo Handbook.

Comment 1 Jan Brinkmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-03-10 10:26:14 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 81409 ***