Bug 833382 – app-admin/helm-3.8.0 fails tests on MUSL

• Status: CONFIRMED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Agostino Sarubbo 2022-02-15 07:18:51 UTC]

https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: app-admin/helm-3.8.0 fails tests.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: tinderbox_musl)

NOTE:
This machine uses MUSL libc

[Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo 2022-02-15 07:18:54 UTC]

Created attachment 765153 [details]
build.log.xz

build log and emerge --info (compressed because it exceeds attachment limit, use 'xzless' to read it)

[Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo 2022-02-15 07:18:55 UTC]

Error(s) that match a know pattern:


Assertion failed: bc_ctl.arg_max >= LINE_MAX (xargs.c: main: 511)

[Comment 3 John Helmert III 2022-11-29 23:03:09 UTC]

If the tinderbox_musl hasn't reproduced the issue in a while, does it mean that the issue is fixed?

[Comment 4 John Helmert III 2022-11-29 23:14:54 UTC]

Oh, this isn't even a test failure?

 * Skipping make test/check due to ebuild restriction.
>>> Test phase [disabled because of RESTRICT=test]: app-admin/helm-3.8.0

>>> Install app-admin/helm-3.8.0 into /var/tmp/portage/app-admin/helm-3.8.0/image
>>> Completed installing app-admin/helm-3.8.0 into /var/tmp/portage/app-admin/helm-3.8.0/image

 * Final size of build directory: 81996 KiB (80.0 MiB)
 * Final size of installed tree:  75808 KiB (74.0 MiB)

Assertion failed: bc_ctl.arg_max >= LINE_MAX (xargs.c: main: 511)
Assertion failed: bc_ctl.arg_max >= LINE_MAX (xargs.c: main: 511)
Assertion failed: bc_ctl.arg_max >= LINE_MAX (xargs.c: main: 511)
/usr/lib/portage/python3.10/isolated-functions.sh: line 473: 28753 Aborted                 "${xargs[@]}" "${@}"
Assertion failed: bc_ctl.arg_max >= LINE_MAX (xargs.c: main: 511)
Assertion failed: bc_ctl.arg_max >= LINE_MAX (xargs.c: main: 511)
/usr/lib/portage/python3.10/isolated-functions.sh: line 473: 28820 Aborted                 "${xargs[@]}" "${@}"
 * ERROR: app-admin/helm-3.8.0::gentoo failed:
 *   ecompress failed

[Comment 5 Sam James 2022-11-29 23:31:48 UTC]

go/env limit size issue again

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2022-11-30 08:21:56 UTC]

(In reply to John Helmert III from comment #3)
> If the tinderbox_musl hasn't reproduced the issue in a while, does it mean
> that the issue is fixed?

tinderbox musl runs from times to times, no continuously. So I'll verify