I still can't update beyond gcc-9 because there are two bugs introduced with gcc-10 for me, and since you already deleted any gcc related stuff from the musl overlay please be so kind to upload the patch tarball. Thank you.
What are the bugs with GCC 10 you're hitting? GCC 9 is nearly out of support. Note that gcc 9 was not in the overlay at the point I removed it from ::musl: https://github.com/gentoo/musl/commit/705fa69940aa50422a3fe98729d5a8bfc4a011f9.
(It'd also be useful if you could let me know exactly which patches you've been using all this time, if you're still using GCC 9?)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/724314 of course, and an yet unreported arm bug. it seems low hanging fruit to me to add the tarball. this is the old code from gcc-9.4.0: > src_prepare() { > toolchain_src_prepare > > if use elibc_musl || [[ ${CATEGORY} = cross-*-musl* ]]; then > eapply "${FILESDIR}"/6.3.0/cpu_indicator.patch > eapply "${FILESDIR}"/7.1.0/posix_memalign.patch > case $(tc-arch) in > amd64|arm64|ppc64) eapply "${FILESDIR}"/9.3.0/gcc-pure64.patch ;; > esac > fi > > eapply_user > }
(In reply to tt_1 from comment #3) > https://bugs.gentoo.org/724314 of course, and an yet unreported arm bug. > Right. I mean, we're still not sure if that's actually a GCC bug or something in hardware, but in any case, fair enough. You should really get a move on with reporting whatever this ARM bug is though. The more time goes on, the harder it's going to be to figure out where it was introduced. > it seems low hanging fruit to me to add the tarball. > Sure, I'm not against it. It just read a bit like what we did somehow changed the situation when it hasn't really. > this is the old code from gcc-9.4.0: > > > src_prepare() { > > toolchain_src_prepare > > > > if use elibc_musl || [[ ${CATEGORY} = cross-*-musl* ]]; then > > eapply "${FILESDIR}"/6.3.0/cpu_indicator.patch > > eapply "${FILESDIR}"/7.1.0/posix_memalign.patch > > case $(tc-arch) in > > amd64|arm64|ppc64) eapply "${FILESDIR}"/9.3.0/gcc-pure64.patch ;; > > esac > > fi > > > > eapply_user > > } Thanks, I'll look at it later.
you will propably have to use the older posix_memalign patch, take way back machine for a shortcut: https://github.com/gentoo/musl/tree/3f5f325fb24b120315f6b523d754930a116935dd/sys-devel/gcc/files/7.1.0
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=cfec3b98f2821652f521441da68f6e109f77b5aa commit cfec3b98f2821652f521441da68f6e109f77b5aa Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-21 14:13:11 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-21 14:13:57 +0000 sys-devel/gcc: add musl support to 9.4.0 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825458 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> profiles/features/musl/package.mask | 4 ++-- sys-devel/gcc/Manifest | 1 + sys-devel/gcc/gcc-9.4.0.ebuild | 2 +- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
