Both pam_wrapper ebuilds currently present in the tree implicitly assume native-ABI libpam.so to be installed in ${EPREFIX}/$(get_libdir). If, however, sys-libs/pam has been emerged with USE=-split-usr (which is currently made possible by sys-libs/pam-1.5.2-r1, owing to this ebuild inheriting usr-ldscript.eclass) - all PAM libraries are located in ${EPREFIX}/usr/$(get_libdir), pam_wrapper produces the following error: pwrap_init: Failed to read libpam.so link both in its own test suite and when in use elsewhere (e.g. in sys-auth/fprintd tests).
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=834518e670c13f7ccfcf8bff134074f36f404930 commit 834518e670c13f7ccfcf8bff134074f36f404930 Author: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-21 22:32:49 +0000 Commit: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-21 22:35:36 +0000 sys-libs/pam_wrapper: let cmake find libpam pam_wrapper will still need to be rebuilt when libpam changes location, but at least this lets it work after a rebuild. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825078 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org> .../{pam_wrapper-1.1.3-r2.ebuild => pam_wrapper-1.1.3-r3.ebuild} | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6b84b0b5a44afd525b2018db5a0813141554381a commit 6b84b0b5a44afd525b2018db5a0813141554381a Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-03-09 23:52:45 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-03-09 23:52:45 +0000 sys-libs/pam_wrapper: depend on newer PAM (non split-usr) We can be sure of the location of PAM if we depend on a new enough version. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825078 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../{pam_wrapper-1.1.4.ebuild => pam_wrapper-1.1.4-r1.ebuild} | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/gentoo-news.git/commit/?id=114a15884faf88f202073de48812613b264f49e0 commit 114a15884faf88f202073de48812613b264f49e0 Author: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> AuthorDate: 2024-01-02 04:04:32 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-01-05 04:10:37 +0000 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs: add news item Revival of commit a79dd69b0cca439bc0c483c9193c79e0554819d0. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/868306#c10 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/902829 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/915379 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825078 Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../2024-01-05-usr-initramfs.en.txt | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=be1b61e0867fc6528c1bdf47556c0da674e4349c commit be1b61e0867fc6528c1bdf47556c0da674e4349c Author: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> AuthorDate: 2024-02-06 05:27:28 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-02-06 22:40:59 +0000 sys-libs/pam_wrapper: revbump to force rebuilding against updated pam We got rid of the terrible usr-ldscript hack. It is now possible to build this sanely. Force it to rebuild against the updated pam (for the sake of split-usr profiles). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825078 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825758 Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sys-libs/pam_wrapper/pam_wrapper-1.1.4-r3.ebuild | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=72d0c560a13563ebd6e7b010cc5ab169fb2efc8b commit 72d0c560a13563ebd6e7b010cc5ab169fb2efc8b Author: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> AuthorDate: 2024-02-06 04:50:41 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-02-06 22:40:58 +0000 sys-libs/pam: remove usr-ldscript support Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors. The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about split-usr at all. [sam: add bug #868306 ref.] Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825078 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825758 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/868306 Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sys-libs/pam/pam-1.5.3-r1.ebuild | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
