Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 792162 - mail-filter/spf-engine-2.9.2-r1: stabilisation (was: ebuild needs to be updated for Python 3.9)
Summary: mail-filter/spf-engine-2.9.2-r1: stabilisation (was: ebuild needs to be updat...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Michael Orlitzky
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: CC-ARCHES
Depends on:
Blocks: py39, python3.9-compat python3.9-stable
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2021-05-26 05:50 UTC by Denny Page
Modified: 2021-05-29 16:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
mail-filter/spf-engine-2.9.2-r1
Runtime testing required: ---
nattka: sanity-check+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Denny Page 2021-05-26 05:50:12 UTC 
The ebuild of spf-engine needs to be updated for Python 3.9 support in advance of the switch of the default Python version to 3.9 scheduled for 2021-06-01.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2021-05-29 01:07:37 UTC 
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1e3bfb35dc8d9e84ff3c9a0182fbbfd76af94073

commit 1e3bfb35dc8d9e84ff3c9a0182fbbfd76af94073
Author:     Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2021-05-29 01:05:00 +0000
Commit:     Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2021-05-29 01:06:57 +0000

    mail-filter/spf-engine: new revision with python-3.9 support.
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/792162
    Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.18, Repoman-3.0.2
    Signed-off-by: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>

 .../{spf-engine-2.9.2.ebuild => spf-engine-2.9.2-r1.ebuild}           | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comment 2 Denny Page 2021-05-29 06:12:47 UTC 
Should 2.9.2-r1 be marked as stable?
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-05-29 06:42:49 UTC 
(In reply to Denny Page from comment #2)
> Should 2.9.2-r1 be marked as stable?

Yep, let's do that!
Comment 4 Michael Orlitzky gentoo-dev 2021-05-29 12:17:27 UTC 
It hasn't been tested much with python-3.9, but no NEW tests fail with is... so, sure.
Comment 5 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-05-29 15:21:27 UTC 
amd64 done
Comment 6 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-05-29 16:08:57 UTC 
x86 done

all arches done