772515 – dev-python/pyilmbase-2.5.4: stablereq

Bug 772515 - dev-python/pyilmbase-2.5.4: stablereq

Summary: dev-python/pyilmbase-2.5.4: stablereq

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 770229

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Bernd

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2021-02-24 20:53 UTC by Michał Górny
Modified:	2021-02-25 17:07 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:	dev-python/pyilmbase-2.5.4 amd64 media-libs/ilmbase-2.5.4 media-libs/openexr-2.5.4
Runtime testing required:	---

Flags:	nattka: sanity-check+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Michał Górny archtester

2021-02-24 20:53:21 UTC

Please stabilize.

Comment 1 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev

2021-02-24 20:57:49 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)

Sanity check failed:

> dev-python/pyilmbase-2.5.4
>   depend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/x32 (1 total)
>     ~media-libs/ilmbase-2.5.4:=
>   depend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (15 total)
>     ~media-libs/ilmbase-2.5.4:=
>   rdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/x32 (1 total)
>     ~media-libs/ilmbase-2.5.4:=
>   rdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (15 total)
>     ~media-libs/ilmbase-2.5.4:=

Comment 2 Bernd 2021-02-24 21:02:58 UTC

Now I'm a little confused. Stabilization was already in progress, when Sam removed the CC-ARCHES flag, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/762862

Comment 3 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev

2021-02-24 21:28:51 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)

Resetting sanity check; keywords are not fully specified and arches are not CC-ed.

Comment 4 Sam James archtester

2021-02-25 09:54:21 UTC

(In reply to Bernd from comment #2)
> Now I'm a little confused. Stabilization was already in progress, when Sam
> removed the CC-ARCHES flag, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/762862

Sorry for the confusion!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 770229 ***

Comment 5 Bernd 2021-02-25 17:07:07 UTC

No worries