Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 763204 - app-text/poppler-20.12.1 stabilisation
Summary: app-text/poppler-20.12.1 stabilisation
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Maciej Mrozowski
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: LATER
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-01-02 23:16 UTC by Andreas Sturmlechner
Modified: 2021-01-03 16:37 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
app-text/poppler-20.12.1 *
Runtime testing required: ---
nattka: sanity-check+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:16:40 UTC 
Makes sense to be done in sync with bug 755704.
Comment 1 Matt Turner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:24:07 UTC 
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #0)
> Makes sense to be done in sync with bug 755704.

Then you have to do it in the same bug. Time and time again we've seen that leaving a comment telling testers to do them in sync doesn't work.
Comment 2 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:27:46 UTC 
No, it must not block security bugs just out of courtesy not to cause IUSE-dependent rebuild. There is no direct dependence on the linked bug.
Comment 3 Matt Turner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:34:30 UTC 
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #2)
> No, it must not block security bugs just out of courtesy not to cause
> IUSE-dependent rebuild. There is no direct dependence on the linked bug.

I don't understand. Which bug are you saying is blocking a security bug?

I'm suggesting that you just put poppler in the other bug's stabilization list to ensure that it and icu are stabilized at the same time.
Comment 4 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:38:38 UTC 
Any potential problem during stabilisation caused by additional items in the package list that need not necessarily be there.

And no, I won't change my opinion even if you use capitals.
Comment 5 Matt Turner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:42:55 UTC 
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #4)
> And no, I won't change my opinion even if you use capitals.

What?
Comment 6 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:44:46 UTC 
https://bugs.gentoo.org/728964#c5
Comment 7 Matt Turner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:45:36 UTC 
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #4)
> Any potential problem during stabilisation caused by additional items in the
> package list that need not necessarily be there.

Maybe just ask the security people? The other bug's been open for two weeks. I don't think we're risking much.
Comment 8 Matt Turner gentoo-dev 2021-01-02 23:46:46 UTC 
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #6)
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/728964#c5

Wow, that really must have struck a nerve or something. That wasn't my intention, so I'm sorry. But I think you're being more than a little obtuse in not doing the trivially obvious thing that will avoid unnecessary rebuilds.
Comment 9 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2021-01-03 16:37:36 UTC 
No stable for you then.