Contents of media-gfx/opencsg-1.4.2-r1: /usr /usr/include /usr/include/opencsg.h /usr/lib64 /usr/lib64/libopencsg.so -> libopencsg.so.1.4.2 /usr/lib64/libopencsg.so.1 -> libopencsg.so.1.4.2 /usr/lib64/libopencsg.so.1.4 -> libopencsg.so.1.4.2 /usr/lib64/libopencsg.so.1.4.2 /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/opencsg-1.4.2-r1 /usr/share/doc/opencsg-1.4.2-r1/build.txt.lzma /usr/share/doc/opencsg-1.4.2-r1/changelog.txt.lzma Any good reason to keep it in media-gfx? Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
media-gfx description: "The media-gfx category contains graphics-related packages." media-libs description: "The media-libs category contains media-related libraries." media-gfx/opencsg DESCRIPTION: "The Constructive Solid Geometry rendering library" So package seems firmly grounded in "graphics" world, fits the category.
I agree with Andreas, the package provides a graphics related package and thus fits well in media-gfx. This category does in my opinion not intend to only contain packages which are having executable files, but can also contain libraries. Currently I see no reason to move the package to media-libs, and therefore closing the issue. Feel free to reopen it, if you have other arguments for the move.