currrent packaged versions are old and doen'w work with wayland. So I tweaked the last ebuild to source from the svn repo, which has been updated to use SDL2, whch works with wayland natively. It works for me on sway/wayland just fine. Attached the ebuild. Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 631082 [details] new ebuild
Thank you for your contribution. I had a short look on the ebuild. Here a few ideas: * can't you use a specific commit instead a 9999? It will less often break. * Please test the ebuild with repoman full -d -x https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Repoman and pkgcheck * We always try to use the latest EAPI, please bump to EAPI=7 * Please remove obsolete lines * remove KEYWORDS for 9999 * please fix the header. (see /usr/portage/skel.ebuild and https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/eapi/) * A bot can look for additional mistakes, if you upload a PR via github * We can help you on IRC #gentoo-dev-help to improve the ebuild, if you got stuck.
I know about that version. That too is old. I've used it until recently. But htat version still doessn't work with Wayland - it still uses SDL1. Meanwhile, current latest svn stuff works great with wayland. I've corrreected the ebuild ( thrown outr games eclass stuff, but have a few snags left. Will upload it shortly...
(In reply to Branko Badrljica from comment #3) > I know about that version. That too is old. > I've used it until recently. > > But htat version still doessn't work with Wayland - it still uses SDL1. > > Meanwhile, current latest svn stuff works great with wayland. > > I've corrreected the ebuild ( thrown outr games eclass stuff, but have a > few snags left. Will upload it shortly... https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/19820 Remove games.eclass
Created attachment 693813 [details] new version ( without games eclass) prablably couple other changes done , too. This is latest version that I'm using.
If it's still relevant, I'd appreciate you posting the patch in git format-patch format or as a GitHub PR. Either way, can you include the GCO sign off in a comment?
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6) > If it's still relevant, I'd appreciate you posting the patch in git > format-patch format or as a GitHub PR. Either way, can you include the GCO > sign off in a comment? I posted this because I worked on this package when fixing all the games.eclass consumers, but I appreciate it’s been a while. I’ve bumped for bug 759535. Please reopen if you are still bothered about a live ebuild. Not sure if we really need one.
