Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 7109 - mono-0.15.ebuild
Summary: mono-0.15.ebuild
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 8720
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: George Shapovalov (RETIRED)
URL: http://www.go-mono.org/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 7107
Blocks: 5691
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2002-08-27 05:52 UTC by Andreas Simon
Modified: 2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ebuild (mono-0.15.ebuild,1.23 KB, text/plain)
2002-08-27 05:53 UTC, Andreas Simon
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andreas Simon 2002-08-27 05:52:53 UTC
Ebuild for the newest and greatest Mono release.
(old release in portage is mono-0.13)

Changes to the old ebuild:

* build against boehm-gc, as the official rpms
  do too (for quite some time). With the new
  boehm-gc 6.1alpha5, garbage collection in Mono
  seems to actually work.
* install a missing doc file which was forgotten
  by the old ebuild.

Cheers,
Andreas Simon

Btw, a ebuild for boehm-gc 6.1alpha5 was
also posted by me. This is required for
this ebuild.
Comment 1 Andreas Simon 2002-08-27 05:53:25 UTC
Created attachment 3472 [details]
ebuild

Attachment created.
Comment 2 Andreas Simon 2002-08-27 06:25:49 UTC
I forgot to mention an other change I made in
respect to the 0.13 ebuild: I added a description which
is a little bit more verbose then the old one.
Comment 3 Andreas Simon 2002-08-27 07:52:17 UTC
I just read that DESCRIPTION should be
a short, one line description of the package.

Thus I think the one in the ebuild is too long
and should be better replaced with something like:

DESCRIPTION="Mono runtime, an open source version of the Microsoft .NET runtime."
Comment 4 Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-10-03 12:29:16 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8720 ***