Created attachment 596306 [details] Output of emerge --info These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ] sys-apps/kmod-26-r3::gentoo [26-r2::gentoo] USE="tools zlib -debug -doc -libressl -lzma -pkcs7% -python -static-libs (-ssl%*)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_6 -python3_5 (-python3_7)" 0 KiB [ebuild U ] sys-apps/acl-2.2.53::gentoo [2.2.52-r1::gentoo] USE="nls (split-usr) -static-libs" ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" 513 KiB [ebuild U ] media-libs/flac-1.3.3::gentoo [1.3.2-r1::gentoo] USE="cxx ogg (-altivec) -debug -static-libs" ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" CPU_FLAGS_X86="-sse" 1,020 KiB [ebuild U ] app-eselect/eselect-blas-0.2::gentoo [0.1::gentoo] 0 KiB [ebuild U ] x11-libs/libnotify-0.7.8::gentoo [0.7.7-r1::gentoo] USE="introspection -test" ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" 106 KiB [ebuild N ] sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0::gentoo USE="-doc -eselect-ldso -lapacke" 7,253 KiB [uninstall ] sci-libs/lapack-reference-3.2.1-r4::gentoo USE="-doc" [blocks b ] sci-libs/lapack-reference ("sci-libs/lapack-reference" is blocking sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) [ebuild U ] virtual/blas-3.8::gentoo [3.7::gentoo] USE="-eselect-ldso%" 0 KiB [ebuild U ] virtual/lapack-3.8::gentoo [3.1::gentoo] USE="-eselect-ldso%" 0 KiB [blocks B ] sci-libs/cblas-reference ("sci-libs/cblas-reference" is blocking sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) [blocks B ] app-eselect/eselect-cblas ("app-eselect/eselect-cblas" is blocking sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) [blocks B ] sci-libs/blas-reference ("sci-libs/blas-reference" is blocking sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) Total: 8 packages (7 upgrades, 1 new, 1 uninstall), Size of downloads: 8,890 KiB Conflict: 4 blocks (3 unsatisfied) * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be * installed at the same time on the same system. (sci-libs/cblas-reference-20030223-r6:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by sci-libs/cblas-reference required by @selected sci-libs/cblas-reference required by (virtual/cblas-1.0:0/0::gentoo, installed) (sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by >=sci-libs/lapack-3.8[eselect-ldso?] (>=sci-libs/lapack-3.8) required by (virtual/blas-3.8:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) >=sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0[eselect-ldso?] (>=sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) required by (virtual/lapack-3.8:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (app-eselect/eselect-cblas-0.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by app-eselect/eselect-cblas required by @selected app-eselect/eselect-cblas required by (sci-libs/cblas-reference-20030223-r6:0/0::gentoo, installed) (sci-libs/blas-reference-20161223:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by sci-libs/blas-reference required by @selected
Should be resolved after https://bugs.gentoo.org/700196
The stabilization of virtual/cblas-3.8 causes more blocks: These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N #] sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0::gentoo USE="-doc -eselect-ldso -lapacke" 7,253 KiB [ebuild U ] virtual/cblas-3.8::gentoo [1.0::gentoo] USE="-eselect-ldso%" 0 KiB [blocks B ] app-eselect/eselect-cblas ("app-eselect/eselect-cblas" is blocking sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) [blocks B ] sci-libs/lapack-reference ("sci-libs/lapack-reference" is blocking sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) [blocks B ] sci-libs/blas-reference ("sci-libs/blas-reference" is blocking sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) [blocks B ] sci-libs/cblas-reference ("sci-libs/cblas-reference" is blocking sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) Total: 2 packages (1 upgrade, 1 new), Size of downloads: 7,253 KiB Conflict: 4 blocks (4 unsatisfied) * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be * installed at the same time on the same system. (app-eselect/eselect-cblas-0.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by app-eselect/eselect-cblas required by @selected app-eselect/eselect-cblas required by (sci-libs/cblas-reference-20030223-r6:0/0::gentoo, installed) (sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by >=sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0[eselect-ldso?] (>=sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0) required by (virtual/cblas-3.8:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (sci-libs/lapack-reference-3.2.1-r4:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by >=sci-libs/lapack-reference-3.1 required by (virtual/lapack-3.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) (sci-libs/blas-reference-20161223:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by >=sci-libs/blas-reference-20161223 required by (virtual/blas-3.7:0/0::gentoo, installed) sci-libs/blas-reference required by @selected (sci-libs/cblas-reference-20030223-r6:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by sci-libs/cblas-reference required by @selected
(In reply to Harley Wiltzer from comment #2) > > Total: 2 packages (1 upgrade, 1 new), Size of downloads: 7,253 KiB > Conflict: 4 blocks (4 unsatisfied) > > * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be > * installed at the same time on the same system. > > (app-eselect/eselect-cblas-0.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > app-eselect/eselect-cblas required by @selected > app-eselect/eselect-cblas required by > (sci-libs/cblas-reference-20030223-r6:0/0::gentoo, installed) > > (sci-libs/blas-reference-20161223:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > >=sci-libs/blas-reference-20161223 required by > (virtual/blas-3.7:0/0::gentoo, installed) > sci-libs/blas-reference required by @selected > > (sci-libs/cblas-reference-20030223-r6:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > sci-libs/cblas-reference required by @selected You have selected eselect-cblas, etc. Portage cannot automatically resolve it. The only way is to manually remove these 3 packages.
(In reply to Benda Xu from comment #3) > You have selected eselect-cblas, etc. Portage cannot automatically resolve > it. The only way is to manually remove these 3 packages. Well for the time being I masked >=cblas-3.8, etc, with the idea that once this bug is resolved I can simply unmask them.
(In reply to Harley Wiltzer from comment #4) > (In reply to Benda Xu from comment #3) > > You have selected eselect-cblas, etc. Portage cannot automatically resolve > > it. The only way is to manually remove these 3 packages. > > Well for the time being I masked >=cblas-3.8, etc, with the idea that once > this bug is resolved I can simply unmask them. The migration requires manual intervention in your case. You can postpond it to the future but that cannot be circumvented as far as I can see.
