Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 697914 - sys-apps/portage FEATURES= request: test-delay
Summary: sys-apps/portage FEATURES= request: test-delay
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Enhancement/Feature Requests (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal with 2 votes (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 912975
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2019-10-17 07:27 UTC by Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED)
Modified: 2023-08-24 20:24 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2019-10-17 07:27:40 UTC
There's a recurring pain point when testing packages which in turn, have inherently circular dependencies.

X[test] requires Y, Y requires X.

This is something that is inherently unavoidable because Upstream are doing things that way. (python, ruby, rust, all do this)

What this means is, for a plethora of targets, FEATURES="test" causes unfixable dependency cycles.

There's an unpleasant workaround:

1. Install X with FEATURES="-test"
2. Install X --onlydeps --with-test-deps with FEATURES="-test"
3. Install X with FEATURES="test"

Instead, it would be nice to add a hint to the portage resolver that it is allowed to break cycles by internally toggling the "test" flag (and feature), if-and-only-if it would lead to a cycle, and then later, staging a rebuild of the same target with USE="test" FEATURES="test".

The usual opposition I hear from such an approach is "Why run tests if you're just going to install the packages without testing".

But my use-case is not to *actually use* the package, my usecase is to maximise my ability to test a wide variety of packages in as few steps as possible.

I'm not married to the name, just the concept. ;)