Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 680294 - Please provide a binary package for net-libs/webkit-gtk
Summary: Please provide a binary package for net-libs/webkit-gtk
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 526998
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-03-14 07:41 UTC by Tobias Leupold
Modified: 2019-03-14 08:47 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tobias Leupold 2019-03-14 07:41:56 UTC
Multiple bugs have been filed about build errors of net-libs/webkit-gtk. Apparently, this package needs a lot of RAM to build and the build tends to fail randomly on smaller machines (even with -j1 set).

Would it be possible to provide a binary package for net-libs/webkit-gtk as an alternative to the normal ebuild?

On older/smaller systems, it's almost impossible to compile net-libs/webkit-gtk nowadays (and I personally have quite a lot of small and/or old machines to take care of ;-) ... would be really nice.
Comment 1 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2019-03-14 07:49:17 UTC
No, it's not really possible. Unlike firefox, chrome and so on, webkit-gtk is a library, not a browser, with various USE flag options and things depend on it (unlike on firefox and chrome) - no-one uses webkit-gtk package provided things directly. Theoretically if we build support for most options into that package, it might be possible, but that needs then always creating binary packages on each bump, have the infrastructure for it, etc. Either way, this is a long-term discussion on the duplicate bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 526998 ***
Comment 2 Tobias Leupold 2019-03-14 08:47:14 UTC
Oh okay, I didn't see such a bug already exists. Thanks for the info, I'll read on there!