Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 67494 - glsa-check -f all wants to upgrade glibc
Summary: glsa-check -f all wants to upgrade glibc
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 68050
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-13 18:13 UTC by frank
Modified: 2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description frank 2004-10-13 18:13:07 UTC
# qpkg -I -i glibc
sys-libs/glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r1 *
(which is not affected by 200408-16)
# glsa-check -t all
WARNING: This tool is completely new and not very tested, so it should not be
used on production systems. It's mainly a test tool for the new GLSA release
and distribution system, it's functionality will later be merged into emerge
and equery.
Please read http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/glsa-integration.xml
before using this tool AND before reporting a bug.

This system is affected by the following GLSA:
200410-07

but when executing glsa-check -f all
sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1 will be emerged

btw: is vanilla 2.6.8.1 still affected by 200410-07?

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
on any system with sys-libs/glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r1 installed:
1. emerge sync
2. glsa-check -t all
3. glsa-check -f all

Actual Results:
Comment 1 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-10-14 04:51:19 UTC
Which gentoolkit version is that ? If it's pre8 please try with pre10.
Comment 2 frank 2004-10-14 05:34:59 UTC
yes, it's pre8... (sorry for omitting this detail)
pre10 doesn't solve the problem because it still wants to upgrade glibc
the only difference is that pre10 wants to emerge sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20041006 (which is masked) instead of sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1
Comment 3 frank 2004-10-25 16:58:48 UTC
update:
in the meantime glsa 200410-19 came out...
i manually upgraded to glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r2 which is unaffected.
(glsa-check would have been emerged sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1 but i'm afraid upgrading glibc version on a production server)
after that, "glsa-check -t all" says the system is still affected by 200410-19,
consequently, a further "glsa-check -f all" would emerge glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1 which isn't a desiderable feature :(
Comment 4 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-12-08 02:16:48 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 68050 ***