Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 651352 - Repeating gentoo-dev spam from Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.sec09 AT gmail.com>
Summary: Repeating gentoo-dev spam from Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.sec09 AT gmail.com>
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Community Relations
Classification: Unclassified
Component: User Relations (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Community Relations Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-03-24 12:04 UTC by Michał Górny
Modified: 2019-01-07 17:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2018-03-24 12:04:09 UTC
Apparently some GSoC student who expects developers to do all the work for him and keeps sending the same mail over and over again.

https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/dfdc4b56cd8e7f21b7b88f0ad266ed47
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/a0d31bf2988bda37cd5e5702612c7fe0
Comment 1 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2018-03-24 16:26:46 UTC
You likely want to respond signaling that sentiment to the user / list before comrel has any place in it. Incidentally an understanding of this specific list's etiquette would be better handled once the whitelisting in bug 650964 is in place.
Comment 2 Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2018-03-24 17:09:28 UTC
Are you talking about something like [1]?

[1]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/827c93a0c61b17525f7f9e49c9c29f8c
Comment 3 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2018-03-24 17:19:22 UTC
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #2)
> Are you talking about something like [1]?
> 
> [1]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/
> 827c93a0c61b17525f7f9e49c9c29f8c

Right, but that is part of the initial report to begin with (2nd link). There isn't anything for comrel to do here.
Comment 4 Kristian Fiskerstrand (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2018-03-24 17:40:16 UTC
(In reply to Kristian Fiskerstrand from comment #3)
> (In reply to Michał Górny from comment #2)
> > Are you talking about something like [1]?
> > 
> > [1]:https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/
> > 827c93a0c61b17525f7f9e49c9c29f8c
> 
> Right, but that is part of the initial report to begin with (2nd link).
> There isn't anything for comrel to do here.

Elaborating a bit more, this user isn't in breach of CoCs etc but likely has little understanding of how open source communities works. That can be all fine in a users mailing list, but likely not in a developer mailing list. Which is why we define the mailing lists differently. There are currently no technical constraints in place, but the -dev list is intended for devs and whitelisted participants only, c.f. bug 650964. other than that; there is no comrel participation relevant.
Comment 5 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2019-01-07 17:53:37 UTC
This was not really spam but GSoC student questions, afterwards gentoo-dev moderation was introduced and I do not see this individual amongst whitelisted persons.