Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 635302 - =sys-fs/udisks-2.7.4 stabilisation request
Summary: =sys-fs/udisks-2.7.4 stabilisation request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Freedesktop bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on: 639110 641308
Blocks: 635292
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2017-10-24 13:01 UTC by Michael Palimaka (kensington)
Modified: 2018-01-22 18:20 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
=sys-fs/udisks-2.7.4-r1 =sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14-r1 =dev-libs/libbytesize-1.2-r1 =dev-libs/volume_key-0.3.9 =dev-python/pocketlint-0.15 =dev-python/polib-1.0.7
Runtime testing required: ---
stable-bot: sanity-check+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2017-10-24 13:01:17 UTC 
Is it OK to stabilise a newer version of sys-fs/udisks? This is needed to get elogind stable.
Comment 1 Stabilization helper bot gentoo-dev 2017-11-28 20:02:54 UTC 
An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (145 lines truncated): 

> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[crypt,lvm?]']
> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: RDEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[crypt,lvm?]']
> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[crypt,lvm?]']
Comment 2 Stabilization helper bot gentoo-dev 2017-11-28 21:01:24 UTC 
An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (145 lines truncated): 

> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[crypt,lvm?]']
> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: RDEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[crypt,lvm?]']
> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[crypt,lvm?]']
Comment 3 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2017-11-29 20:39:26 UTC 
Let's stabilise what's actually keyworded so far.

non-{amd64,x86} need to be keyworded first.
Comment 4 Stabilization helper bot gentoo-dev 2017-11-29 21:02:16 UTC 
An automated check of this bug succeeded - the previous repoman errors are now resolved.
Comment 5 Thomas Deutschmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-11-30 19:05:22 UTC 
x86 stable
Comment 6 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2017-12-02 09:20:30 UTC 
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #3)
> Let's stabilise what's actually keyworded so far.
> 
> non-{amd64,x86} need to be keyworded first.

Where is the udisks re-keywording bug? I cannot find it to put it as blocker of this one
Comment 7 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2017-12-02 09:27:48 UTC 
There's none yet that I'm aware of. Maybe we can figure out before which arches actually need keywording? Or did you check already?
Comment 8 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2017-12-09 02:40:25 UTC 
stable amd64
Comment 9 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2017-12-16 12:12:17 UTC 
It is supposed that you must open a rekeywording bug when you need to drop the keywords on a version bump :|
Comment 10 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2017-12-16 12:14:18 UTC 
By "you" I don't mean "you" in concrete... it's something to do when someone bumps and needs to dekeyword the package
Comment 11 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2017-12-16 12:17:28 UTC 
I have opened the bug, I will re-add them here too to let them notice we need also that stabilized as soon as possible :/
Comment 12 Stabilization helper bot gentoo-dev 2017-12-16 13:02:11 UTC 
An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (273 lines truncated): 

> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[cryptsetup,lvm?]']
> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: RDEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[cryptsetup,lvm?]']
> dependency.bad sys-fs/udisks/udisks-2.7.4.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['>=sys-libs/libblockdev-2.14[cryptsetup,lvm?]']
Comment 13 Stabilization helper bot gentoo-dev 2017-12-16 14:01:41 UTC 
An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (273 lines truncated): 

> dependency.bad sys-libs/libblockdev/libblockdev-2.14-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['dev-libs/libbytesize', 'dev-libs/volume_key']
> dependency.bad sys-libs/libblockdev/libblockdev-2.14-r1.ebuild: RDEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['dev-libs/libbytesize', 'dev-libs/volume_key']
> dependency.bad sys-libs/libblockdev/libblockdev-2.14-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['dev-libs/libbytesize', 'dev-libs/volume_key']
Comment 14 Stabilization helper bot gentoo-dev 2017-12-16 15:02:02 UTC 
An automated check of this bug failed - repoman reported dependency errors (89 lines truncated): 

> dependency.bad dev-libs/libbytesize/libbytesize-1.2-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['dev-python/pocketlint', 'dev-python/polib']
> dependency.bad dev-libs/libbytesize/libbytesize-1.2-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) ['dev-python/pocketlint', 'dev-python/polib']
> dependency.bad dev-libs/libbytesize/libbytesize-1.2-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0/desktop) ['dev-python/pocketlint', 'dev-python/polib']
Comment 15 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2017-12-26 14:21:21 UTC 
are we suposed to stabilize 2.7.4 right in this bug? 2.7.* has not been even keyworded at all
Comment 16 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2017-12-26 15:09:52 UTC 
The keywording is in dependent bug 641308... If you feel comfortable, can probably straight to stable to skip some testing, but only alpha, mips, sh and sparc are missing keywords according to it
Comment 17 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2017-12-26 15:13:00 UTC 
Ah, I see the versions are different now. Not sure then, 2.7.5 should at least have ~arch keywords, but maybe this stable request can be upgraded to 2.7.5 by now, which would also avoid gtk-doc in stable tree deptree after my touchups on Dec 19th.
kensington, asturm, Poly-C?
Comment 18 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2017-12-26 15:48:33 UTC 
well, I already performed some testing on both (along with elogind), so we can push chosen version sreight into stable i guess
Comment 19 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-12-28 12:01:06 UTC 
ia64 stable
Comment 20 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2018-01-18 18:58:11 UTC 
arm stable
Comment 21 Stabilization helper bot gentoo-dev 2018-01-21 17:00:31 UTC 
An automated check of this bug failed - the following atom is unknown:

sys-fs/udisks-2.7.4

Please verify the atom list.
Comment 22 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2018-01-22 16:02:10 UTC 
alpha stable
Comment 23 Stabilization helper bot gentoo-dev 2018-01-22 17:01:45 UTC 
An automated check of this bug succeeded - the previous repoman errors are now resolved.
Comment 24 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2018-01-22 18:20:43 UTC 
ppc/ppc64 stable