UFRaw is dead but there is a forked continuation called nUFRaw: https://sourceforge.net/projects/nufraw/files/
I've added a version to my overlay, feel free to test it from there. I can add id to the main tree if it works for you.
I don't use it myself, just wanted to bring this to Gentoo's attention.
I tried to check ufraw vs nufraw. So far: ufraw is more well-known, however it still used CVS which got disabled on sourceforge long time ago. No new commits, and so on. On top of that, project lead/maintainer said: https://sourceforge.net/p/ufraw/discussion/434060/thread/30b4249b/ It would be best if nufraw dev took over ufraw, as ufraw still receives lots of attention. I think the reason why nufraw didn't took over ufraw is because it was started before ufraw actually died. Maybe best way here would be to introduce media-gfx/nufraw, and all packages depending on ufraw turn into (ufraw | nufraw), recommend using nufraw etc? And then phase out ufraw in favor of nufraw.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4789b3a217c455255ac641ce403f940ec1f92432 commit 4789b3a217c455255ac641ce403f940ec1f92432 Author: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-04-13 21:39:20 +0000 Commit: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-06-25 21:22:13 +0000 profiles: Mask media-gfx/ufraw for removal Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/312935 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/341923 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/629050 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/739984 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/775761 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/777534 Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
(In reply to Markus Meier from comment #1) > I've added a version to my overlay, feel free to test it from there. I can > add id to the main tree if it works for you. Good idea! But nufraw from maekke does not compile (templates) both on clang or gcc :-( ...but original media-gfx/ufraw-0.22-r4 compiles and works like magick on gcc-11. On clang-12 it throws dcraw.cc:10086:30: error: invalid suffix on literal; C++11 [...]
So I wanted to say: let ufraw stay!
Jan Psota: so submit a bug report upstream to nUFRaw instead of asking to keep a dead and obsolete version.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=699a7159a7d6c00cc571191e2a8ccd884e8fb670 commit 699a7159a7d6c00cc571191e2a8ccd884e8fb670 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-07-26 02:33:02 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-07-26 02:33:02 +0000 media-gfx/ufraw: treeclean Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/312935 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/341923 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/629050 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/739984 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/775761 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/777534 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> media-gfx/ufraw/Manifest | 1 - .../ufraw/files/ufraw-0.17-cfitsio-automagic.patch | 28 ------ .../ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-CVE-2015-8366.patch | 17 ---- .../ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-CVE-2018-19655.patch | 44 ---------- media-gfx/ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-crashfix.patch | 15 ---- .../files/ufraw-0.22-drop_superfluous_abs.patch | 16 ---- media-gfx/ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-exiv2-0.27.patch | 26 ------ .../ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-fix-unsigned-char.patch | 20 ----- media-gfx/ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-gcc9.patch | 97 --------------------- media-gfx/ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-glib-2.68.patch | 19 ----- .../ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-jasper-automagic.patch | 21 ----- media-gfx/ufraw/files/ufraw-0.22-jpeg9.patch | 32 ------- media-gfx/ufraw/metadata.xml | 13 --- media-gfx/ufraw/ufraw-0.22-r4.ebuild | 99 ---------------------- 14 files changed, 448 deletions(-)
Last-rited package removed.
I think this ticket was closed by mistake. We have a new Package request here.