6258 – openjade-1.3.1-r4 doesnt want to be compiled

Bug 6258 - openjade-1.3.1-r4 doesnt want to be compiled

Summary: openjade-1.3.1-r4 doesnt want to be compiled

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 6257

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	x86 Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Brandon Low (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2002-08-09 12:25 UTC by Mauro Sciaccaluga
Modified:	2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Mauro Sciaccaluga 2002-08-09 12:25:54 UTC

g++: true: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [Allocator.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/openjade-1.3.1-r4/work/openjade-1.3.1/lib'
make[1]: *** [lib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/openjade-1.3.1-r4/work/openjade-1.3.1'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 38, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)

!!! emerge aborting on  /usr/portage/app-text/openjade/openjade-1.3.1-r4.ebuild 

-----------------

i cant figure it out....

Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2002-08-09 12:36:58 UTC

what happens if you run `/bin/true` ?
if the file doesnt exists, do `emerge sh-utils` and then try to compile 
openjade again

Comment 2 Mauro Sciaccaluga 2002-08-09 12:43:56 UTC

oh.. i forgot it.. i have true working... that's weird..
look:

root@sciacca downloads # /bin/true       
root@sciacca downloads # /bin/true --version
true (GNU sh-utils) 2.0.11
Written by no one.

Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

:)

Comment 3 Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2002-08-09 19:41:44 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6257 ***