OpenRC is built on POSIX-ish shell script, and runs using /bin/sh. Therefore, all init.d scripts need to comply with POSIX shell features (plus common thingies like 'local'). $ checkbashisms -f files/boinc.init possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 14 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ ! -d "${RUNTIMEDIR}" ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 17 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ ! -d "${RUNTIMEDIR}" ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 26 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ ! -e "${RUNTIMEDIR}"/ca-bundle.crt ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 40 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ -h "${libtarget}" ]] \ && [[ "${libsource}" != "$(readlink "${libtarget}")" ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 47 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ -n "${libsource}" ]] \ && [[ -f "${libsource}" ]] \ && [[ ! -h "${libtarget}" ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 67 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ ! -x "$BOINCBIN" ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 74 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ ! -x "$BOINCCMD" ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 100 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ ! -f "${RUNTIMEDIR}/lockfile" ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 116 (alternative test command ([[ foo ]] should be [ foo ])): if [[ "${ALLOW_REMOTE_RPC}" = "yes" ]]; then possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 160 (sleep only takes one integer): sleep 10s possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 198 (bash arrays, ${name[0|*|@]}): for url in "${master_urls[@]}"; do possible bashism in files/boinc.init line 223 (bash arrays, ${name[0|*|@]}): for url in "${master_urls[@]}"; do
Okay, that is new. I'd like to fix that, shouldn't be a problem. However, not using bash arrays will make the script a bit ugly I guess... :-(
I have updated the script, but want to combine a needed revbump with the fix of bug 609522. The bug doesn't really block this one, the block is just a reminder for me.
Created PR https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/4887
Fixed in https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/commit/2e1256f
