Bug 620478 – =dev-lang/ruby-2.2.6 fails to compile on ia64

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Agostino Sarubbo 2017-06-03 07:08:49 UTC]

Created attachment 475076 [details]
build log

$summary

[Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo 2017-06-03 07:29:35 UTC]

Created attachment 475078 [details]
backtrace

[Comment 2 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) 2017-06-03 09:25:37 UTC]

As I understand bug 561780#c16 ruby@ team applied ia64 SIGSEGV fix
to revbumped ruby only. Namely:

>=dev-lang/ruby-2.2.7-r2:2.2
>=dev-lang/ruby-2.3.4-r2:2.3
>=dev-lang/ruby-2.4.1-r2:2.4

[Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo 2017-06-03 10:16:38 UTC]

ok..since 2.2.6 was the stabilization target I thought it was applied to that version...but you're right

@graaff: can you apply it at 2.2.6 so we can stabilize it for ia64?

[Comment 4 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) 2017-06-03 22:14:40 UTC]

> @graaff: can you apply it at 2.2.6 so we can stabilize it for ia64?

Or another option is to stabilize >=dev-lang/ruby-2.2.7-r2:2.2 on ia64 out of bound earlier to make rest of stabilisation smooth.

[Comment 5 Hans de Graaff 2017-06-05 08:29:23 UTC]

(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #4)
> > @graaff: can you apply it at 2.2.6 so we can stabilize it for ia64?
> 
> Or another option is to stabilize >=dev-lang/ruby-2.2.7-r2:2.2 on ia64 out
> of bound earlier to make rest of stabilisation smooth.

Stabling dev-lang/ruby-2.2.7-r2 early for ia64 would be my preference.

[Comment 6 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) 2017-06-05 21:59:34 UTC]

(In reply to Hans de Graaff from comment #5)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #4)
> > > @graaff: can you apply it at 2.2.6 so we can stabilize it for ia64?
> > 
> > Or another option is to stabilize >=dev-lang/ruby-2.2.7-r2:2.2 on ia64 out
> > of bound earlier to make rest of stabilisation smooth.
> 
> Stabling dev-lang/ruby-2.2.7-r2 early for ia64 would be my preference.

Cool! Stabled ruby22 bundle from bug #615818 on ia64 (=dev-lang/ruby-2.2.7-r2)