Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 620390 - sci-electronics/klayout-0.24.10 stable request
Summary: sci-electronics/klayout-0.24.10 stable request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Andreas K. Hüttel
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on: 633898
Blocks: ruby21-removal
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2017-06-02 05:57 UTC by Hans de Graaff
Modified: 2018-07-28 16:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
sci-electronics/klayout-0.24.10
Runtime testing required: ---
stable-bot: sanity-check+


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hans de Graaff gentoo-dev Security 2017-06-02 05:57:11 UTC
This package still uses ruby 2.1. Ruby 2.1 is no longer supported upstream and will be removed soon. Please update your package to use a newer ruby slot.

Use ruby 2.2 if you can only use one slot and your package is in arch
Use ruby 2.3 if you can only use one slot and your package is in ~arch

Use as many ruby targets as possible when you can use multiple slots.
Comment 1 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2017-08-06 07:49:29 UTC
ommit fd8ca37cb73af8160048d4dd245c65a8c5366c6f (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
Date:   Sun Aug 6 09:46:54 2017 +0200

    sci-electronics/klayout: Version bump, using Ruby 2.2
    
    Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.6, Repoman-2.3.3

 sci-electronics/klayout/Manifest               |  1 +
 sci-electronics/klayout/klayout-0.24.10.ebuild | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)



Feel free to call for stabilization in a few days if there are no regressions in our bugzilla.
Comment 2 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2017-10-09 23:52:20 UTC
x86 is probably not worth the effort; I've already done amd64 myself.