Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 620382 - app-editors/juffed-0.10-r1 won't compile with x11-libs/qscintilla-2.10
Summary: app-editors/juffed-0.10-r1 won't compile with x11-libs/qscintilla-2.10
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Qt Bug Alias
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: qscintilla-2.10
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2017-06-02 05:20 UTC by Thomas
Modified: 2017-10-13 07:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Patch for app-editors/juffed-0.10-r1 (qscintilla-2.10.patch,620 bytes, patch)
2017-06-02 05:20 UTC, Thomas
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Thomas 2017-06-02 05:20:52 UTC
Created attachment 474962 [details, diff]
Patch for app-editors/juffed-0.10-r1

The problem is that the cmake build system searches for libqscintilla2.so but x11-libs/qscintilla-2.10 names the library libqscintilla2_qt4.so. Attached is a quick&dirty patch which fixes the issue for me.
Comment 1 Thomas 2017-06-02 05:22:34 UTC
Adding Davide Pesavento to the CC list as I think he's the one responsible for x11-libs/qscintilla-2.10 problems.
Comment 2 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-06-02 06:17:29 UTC
(In reply to Thomas from comment #1)
> Adding Davide Pesavento to the CC list as I think he's the one responsible
> for x11-libs/qscintilla-2.10 problems.

I'm not responsible for anything. Qscintilla upstream decided to rename the library, and many reverse dependencies now fail to build. That's the reason why >=qscintilla-2.10 is masked.
Comment 3 Fat-Zer 2017-07-16 18:00:29 UTC
Any plans to work towards unmasking of qscintilla-2.10? Is there some excessive list of stuff to be done? It is quite essential because it allows to have both qt4&5 versions installed...

PS: the patch by Thomas looks fine and suitable here... Why not to push it?
Comment 4 Sławomir Nizio 2017-08-18 20:08:13 UTC
It built for me, thanks!
Comment 5 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2017-09-11 13:32:57 UTC
Upstream is very quiet but it looks like git supports Qt 5 so we could consider doing a snapshot.
Comment 6 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2017-10-08 16:44:58 UTC
Added a Qt5-based snapshot 0.10_p20160323 in git commit d58a4c8329db9fe9398adfefa1f76b82d2f8a099, masked for testing.
Comment 7 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2017-10-13 07:36:29 UTC
Mask removed in git commit 0fa39168689fa7bb4375aed8bf157739c2d11596