Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 594356 - dev-dotnet/gtk-sharp-2.12.21 and co. stabilization (list at comment #2)
Summary: dev-dotnet/gtk-sharp-2.12.21 and co. stabilization (list at comment #2)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: dotnet project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks: 580548
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2016-09-19 11:41 UTC by Pacho Ramos
Modified: 2017-01-17 14:35 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
=dev-dotnet/gtk-sharp-2.12.21 amd64 ppc x86 =dev-libs/gmime-2.6.20-r3 alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 =dev-dotnet/gnome-sharp-2.24.2-r1 amd64 ppc x86 =dev-dotnet/mono-addins-1.0-r1 amd64 ppc x86
Runtime testing required: ---
kensington: sanity-check+


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-09-19 11:41:30 UTC
Current state of the tree is a complete mess with some packages requiring the old splitted gtk-sharp and others this one. What is blocking this stabilization? The idea would be to try to stabilize this and port all to this monolithic one
Comment 1 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-09-21 10:02:19 UTC
I can maybe prepare a big list to stabilize for all dotnet maintained packages, try to fix it (for the case more deps are needed) and go ahead, what do you think?
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-11-28 16:04:14 UTC
dev-dotnet/gtk-sharp-2.12.21: amd64 ppc x86
dev-libs/gmime-2.6.20-r3: alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86
dev-dotnet/gnome-sharp-2.24.2-r1: amd64 ppc x86
dev-dotnet/mono-addins-1.0-r1: amd64 ppc x86
Comment 3 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-12-02 18:12:39 UTC
Stable on alpha.
Comment 4 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-12-20 17:17:17 UTC
There seems to be a bug in the addins ebuild:

>>> Source compiled.
>>> Test phase: dev-dotnet/mono-addins-1.0-r1
>>> Working in BUILD_DIR: "/var/tmp/portage/dev-dotnet/mono-addins-1.0-r1/work/mono-addins-1.0_build"
/var/tmp/portage/dev-dotnet/mono-addins-1.0-r1/temp/environment: line 631: pushd: /var/tmp/portage/dev-dotnet/mono-addins-1.0-r1/work/mono-addins-1.0_build: No such file or directory
Comment 5 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2016-12-23 15:43:34 UTC
arm stable
Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2016-12-28 08:56:02 UTC
Dear Maintainer (or who is mainly involved in this stable request),

This is an auto-generated message that will move the current component to the new component Stabilization.
To ensure that the stabilization will proceed correctly, please fill the fields "Atoms to stabilize" and "Runtime testing required" as described here:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/4b2ef0e9aa7588224b8ae799c5fe31fa
Comment 7 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2016-12-30 17:53:18 UTC
An automated check of this bug failed - the following atoms are unknown:

dev-dotnet/gnome-sharp-2.24.2-r1:
dev-dotnet/gtk-sharp-2.12.21:
dev-dotnet/mono-addins-1.0-r1:
dev-libs/gmime-2.6.20-r3:

Please verify the atom list.
Comment 8 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-12-31 13:01:59 UTC
kensington, I think the script is getting confused with the ":"... I am not sure if maybe that ":" could simply be ignore :/

Thanks
Comment 9 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2016-12-31 15:10:38 UTC
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #8)
> kensington, I think the script is getting confused with the ":"... I am not
> sure if maybe that ":" could simply be ignore :/
> 
> Thanks

I do my best to be forgiving with what input is accepted but it's difficult to anticipate every possible type of invalid data. The main purpose of the field is to have a well-defined format (described in the tooltip) that's easy to access using scripts.
Comment 10 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-12-31 15:28:27 UTC
Sure, no problem. I only wanted to warn you for the case you get similar issues like this in the future ;)

I have no problems with dropping it from the list
Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2016-12-31 22:21:32 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2017-01-01 13:01:01 UTC
ppc stable
Comment 13 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2017-01-02 10:01:12 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 14 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2017-01-03 10:45:40 UTC
ppc64 stable
Comment 15 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2017-01-11 10:47:25 UTC
sparc stable
Comment 16 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-01-15 10:03:35 UTC
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 17 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2017-01-17 14:35:25 UTC
ia64 stable. Closing.