I think it should not be installed under /usr/bin or /usr/sbin. According to the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, /usr may be mounted on some different partition and hence not be accessible in single user mode. Therefore having paxctl-ng under /usr might become a hindrance in some critical cases. Additionally, as a developer, I often find myself using paxctl-ng to mark binaries compiled as a regular user. Hence it were comfortable if the utility were located in some directory present in $PATH (/sbin and /usr/sbin are not).
(In reply to Jaak Ristioja from comment #0) > I think it should not be installed under /usr/bin or /usr/sbin. According to > the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, /usr may be mounted on some different > partition and hence not be accessible in single user mode. Therefore having > paxctl-ng under /usr might become a hindrance in some critical cases. > > Additionally, as a developer, I often find myself using paxctl-ng to mark > binaries compiled as a regular user. Hence it were comfortable if the > utility were located in some directory present in $PATH (/sbin and /usr/sbin > are not). its should go into /sbin and i'll add a sym link for backwards compat.
