583780 – dev-libs/svrcore version bump to 4.1.2

Bug 583780 - dev-libs/svrcore version bump to 4.1.2

Summary: dev-libs/svrcore version bump to 4.1.2

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	[OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Wes

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:	584490
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2016-05-22 13:27 UTC by Wes
Modified:	2016-06-12 15:06 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
svrcore 4.1.2 ebuild (svrcore-4.1.2.ebuild,699 bytes, text/plain) 2016-06-09 08:20 UTC, Wes	Details
files/svrcore-4.1-gentoo.patch (svrcore-4.1-gentoo.patch,2.99 KB, patch) 2016-06-09 08:21 UTC, Wes	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Wes 2016-05-22 13:27:45 UTC

Hi @lxnay,

I've been working with wibrown@redhat.com on updating 389-ds in portage.  They've also taken over svrcore upstream now.  The new 1.3.5.4 version of 389-ds they want to push as well as their -9999 ebuild for git master rely on svrcore 4.1.2 which they have provided upstream.

Can you please bump this package so we can push our updated 389-ds?  If you don't feel like doing the legwork I'm happy to re-write the svrcore-4.1.2 ebuild for EAPI=6 when I get a moment and will attach to this bug.

Cheers,
Wes

Comment 1 Wes 2016-06-09 08:20:00 UTC

Created attachment 436932 [details]
svrcore 4.1.2 ebuild

Updated EAPI=6 ebuild for svrcore-4.1.2

Comment 2 Wes 2016-06-09 08:21:15 UTC

Created attachment 436934 [details, diff]
files/svrcore-4.1-gentoo.patch

Patch required to satisfy mozldap's build scripts, and remove some upstream-specific macros

Comment 3 Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev

2016-06-09 12:52:18 UTC

Fixed.

Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2016-06-12 11:32:13 UTC

@Wes, do you want to proxy maintain this?

Comment 5 Wes 2016-06-12 11:44:37 UTC

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #4)
> @Wes, do you want to proxy maintain this?

Hi Pacho, yes see #584490

Comment 6 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2016-06-12 11:46:28 UTC

thanks!

Comment 7 Wes 2016-06-12 12:07:42 UTC

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #6)
> thanks!

I'll update metadata to reflect this and PR shortly, just in the middle of a movie right now :)

Comment 8 Wes 2016-06-12 14:25:49 UTC

metadata updated in https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/1662