Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bugzilla DB migration completed. Please report issues to Infra team via email via infra@gentoo.org or IRC
Bug 583148 - >=app-emulation/virtualbox-5.0.20: QA Notice: Files built without respecting CFLAGS have been detected
Summary: >=app-emulation/virtualbox-5.0.20: QA Notice: Files built without respecting ...
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal QA (vote)
Assignee: Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-05-16 09:10 UTC by Coacher
Modified: 2016-07-19 16:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
emerge --info virtualbox (info,7.20 KB, text/plain)
2016-05-16 09:11 UTC, Coacher 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Coacher 2016-05-16 09:10:59 UTC 
Hello.

Message from portage:

 * QA Notice: Files built without respecting CFLAGS have been detected
 *  Please include the following list of files in your report:
 * /usr/lib64/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOMIPCD
 * /usr/lib64/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so
 * /usr/lib64/virtualbox/components/VBoxXPCOMIPCC.so
 * /usr/lib64/virtualbox/VBoxDbg.so

Please fix.

Note: this is not a dupe of Gentoo bug 555378 as QA issues are different here.
Comment 1 Coacher 2016-05-16 09:11:40 UTC 
Created attachment 434398 [details]
emerge --info virtualbox
Comment 2 Coacher 2016-07-19 13:31:51 UTC 
With 5.1.0 the message is a bit different:

 * QA Notice: Files built without respecting CFLAGS have been detected
 *  Please include the following list of files in your report:
 * /usr/lib64/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOMIPCD
 * /usr/lib64/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so
 * /usr/lib64/virtualbox/components/VBoxXPCOMIPCC.so
Comment 3 Coacher 2016-07-19 16:36:43 UTC 
(In reply to Coacher from comment #2)
> With 5.1.0 the message is a bit different:
It's actually the same. I forgot to enable qt5 USE the first time.