580672 – app-office/libreoffice*-5.1.2.2 app-text/poppler-0.42.0 dev-libs/icu-57.1 stabilization

Bug 580672 - app-office/libreoffice*-5.1.2.2 app-text/poppler-0.42.0 dev-libs/icu-57.1 stabilization

Summary: app-office/libreoffice*-5.1.2.2 app-text/poppler-0.42.0 dev-libs/icu-57.1 sta...

Status:	RESOLVED OBSOLETE

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	[OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo Office Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	STABLEREQ

Depends on:	580756
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2016-04-20 20:01 UTC by Andreas K. Hüttel
Modified:	2016-07-30 23:39 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:	CVE-2015-8868 580674 590096
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Andreas K. Hüttel archtester

2016-04-20 20:01:52 UTC

Please test and stabilize, target x86 amd64

app-office/libreoffice-5.1.2.2
app-office/libreoffice-l10n-5.1.2.2
app-office/libreoffice-bin-5.1.2.2
app-office/libreoffice-bin-debug-5.1.2.2
dev-libs/liborcus-0.9.2-r1

And *simultaneously* (because of libreoffice-bin)

app-text/poppler-0.42.0
dev-libs/icu-57.1


[Other arches for poppler and icu are handled in separate bugs.]

Comment 1 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester

2016-04-21 22:15:57 UTC

Please wait. amd64 package is broken.

Comment 2 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester

2016-04-22 20:13:39 UTC

Please test and stabilize, target x86 amd64

app-office/libreoffice-5.1.2.2
app-office/libreoffice-l10n-5.1.2.2
app-office/libreoffice-bin-5.1.2.2-r1
app-office/libreoffice-bin-debug-5.1.2.2-r1
dev-libs/liborcus-0.9.2-r1

And *simultaneously* (because of libreoffice-bin)

app-text/poppler-0.42.0
dev-libs/icu-57.1

[Please especially test libreoffice-bin on x86.]
[Other arches for poppler and icu are handled in separate bugs.]

Comment 3 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2016-05-07 11:51:50 UTC

amd64 stable

Comment 4 Johannes Huber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2016-05-17 12:52:59 UTC

@Andreas why is the blocker removed from security bug when this (poppler) is needed to full fill security issue?

Comment 5 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester

2016-05-17 13:20:19 UTC

(In reply to Johannes Huber from comment #4)
> @Andreas why is the blocker removed from security bug when this (poppler) is
> needed to full fill security issue?

Because otherwise other arches wait with stabilization until this bug is fixed (because there's a blocker)?

The whole point of separating stabilization into two bugs is to minimize delays.

Comment 6 Johannes Huber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2016-07-08 12:44:06 UTC

(In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #5)
> (In reply to Johannes Huber from comment #4)
> > @Andreas why is the blocker removed from security bug when this (poppler) is
> 
> Because otherwise other arches wait with stabilization until this bug is
> fixed (because there's a blocker)?
> 
> The whole point of separating stabilization into two bugs is to minimize
> delays.

I now it got forgotten. I am against to remove blockers from security bugs ;)

Comment 7 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester

2016-07-20 22:15:06 UTC

Please continue in bug 589284.