Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 561716 - media-tv/xawtv: fail with gcc-5: x11/blit.c:43:8: error: unknown type name 'bool'
Summary: media-tv/xawtv: fail with gcc-5: x11/blit.c:43:8: error: unknown type name 'b...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 548454
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Television related Applications in Gentoo's Portage
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-09-28 10:41 UTC by Manfred Knick
Modified: 2015-09-30 10:08 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
build log (build.log,121.05 KB, text/x-log)
2015-09-28 10:43 UTC, Manfred Knick 		Details
emerge --info '=media-tv/xawtv-3.95-r3::gentoo' (0ei,5.43 KB, text/plain)
2015-09-28 10:45 UTC, Manfred Knick 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Manfred Knick 2015-09-28 10:41:32 UTC 
media-tv/xawtv-3.95-r2 builds with sys-devel/gcc-4.9.3:4.9,
but fails with sys-devel/gcc-5.2.0:5.2

media-tv/xawtv-3.95-r3 fails with sys-devel/gcc-5.2.0.

Blocks  # Bug 536984 - (gcc-5) GCC 5 porting


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Manfred Knick 2015-09-28 10:43:14 UTC 
Created attachment 413134 [details]
build log
Comment 2 Manfred Knick 2015-09-28 10:45:32 UTC 
Created attachment 413136 [details]
emerge --info '=media-tv/xawtv-3.95-r3::gentoo'
Comment 3 Manfred Knick 2015-09-28 10:46:39 UTC 
emerge -pqv '=media-tv/xawtv-3.95-r3::gentoo'

[ebuild     U ] media-tv/xawtv-3.95-r3 [3.95-r2] USE="X alsa dv nls xv -aalib -lirc -motif -opengl -quicktime -xext -zvbi" CPU_FLAGS_X86="(-mmx)"
Comment 4 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-09-30 00:43:01 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 548454 ***
Comment 5 Manfred Knick 2015-09-30 10:08:08 UTC 
The header of Bug 548454 contains no reference to GCC-5 at all;
thus I missed it:
   sorry for the dupe.

Thanks for linking.