Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 560272 - dev-libs/npth-1.1: please stabilize
Summary: dev-libs/npth-1.1: please stabilize
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Crypto team [DISABLED]
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks: gnupg-2.1, gnupg-2.2
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2015-09-12 11:54 UTC by Anthony Basile
Modified: 2016-08-06 20:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-09-12 11:54:06 UTC
This is required for >=app-crypt/gnupg-2.1.6.  It has been in the tree for a while, no bugs and preliminary testing on amd64/ppc/ppc64 show that its good to go.

@crypto team, shall we go ahead?



Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Kristian Fiskerstrand gentoo-dev Security 2015-09-12 12:49:31 UTC
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #0)
> This is required for >=app-crypt/gnupg-2.1.6.  It has been in the tree for a
> while, no bugs and preliminary testing on amd64/ppc/ppc64 show that its good
> to go.
> 
> @crypto team, shall we go ahead?
> 


Stabilizing npth should be fine
Comment 2 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-09-12 14:08:05 UTC
Arch teams ... KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 arm hppa ppc ppc64 x86"
Comment 3 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-09-12 17:12:19 UTC
stable on ppc and ppc64
Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers gentoo-dev 2015-09-14 03:24:44 UTC
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 5 Tobias Klausmann gentoo-dev 2015-09-14 15:03:21 UTC
Stable on alpha.
Comment 6 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-09-15 22:18:45 UTC
stable on amd64
Comment 7 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2015-10-03 08:59:39 UTC
arm stable
Comment 8 Mikle Kolyada archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-10-10 17:32:25 UTC
this version has been keyworded for ~sparc too, so i put sparc team here for the future references.
Comment 9 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-10-11 13:06:40 UTC
(In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #8)
> this version has been keyworded for ~sparc too, so i put sparc team here for
> the future references.

i'm stabilizing it for x86.  Does sparc need to be stabilized too or can i close this bug now that x86 is done?
Comment 10 Mikle Kolyada archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-10-18 16:18:41 UTC
(In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #8)
> this version has been keyworded for ~sparc too, so i put sparc team here for
> the future references.

The same for ia64
Comment 11 Mikle Kolyada archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-10-18 16:20:09 UTC
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #9)
> (In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #8)
> > this version has been keyworded for ~sparc too, so i put sparc team here for
> > the future references.
> 
> i'm stabilizing it for x86.  Does sparc need to be stabilized too or can i
> close this bug now that x86 is done?

It is due to bug 546478, i think i'll take care about sparc and ia64 after at least two weeks of testing, lets keep it open.
Comment 12 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-11-04 21:21:10 UTC
(In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #11)
> (In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #8)
> > > this version has been keyworded for ~sparc too, so i put sparc team here for
> > > the future references.
> > 
> > i'm stabilizing it for x86.  Does sparc need to be stabilized too or can i
> > close this bug now that x86 is done?
> 
> It is due to bug 546478, i think i'll take care about sparc and ia64 after
> at least two weeks of testing, lets keep it open.

Let's take care of ia64 and sparc so we can close this an unblock gnupg-2.1.  We could even start on gnugp-2.1 now for arches where its ready, but its cleaner to do them all at once.
Comment 13 Kristian Fiskerstrand gentoo-dev Security 2015-11-06 14:49:17 UTC
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #12)
> (In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #9)
> > > (In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #8)
> > > > this version has been keyworded for ~sparc too, so i put sparc team here for
> > > > the future references.
> > > 
> > > i'm stabilizing it for x86.  Does sparc need to be stabilized too or can i
> > > close this bug now that x86 is done?
> > 
> > It is due to bug 546478, i think i'll take care about sparc and ia64 after
> > at least two weeks of testing, lets keep it open.
> 
> Let's take care of ia64 and sparc so we can close this an unblock gnupg-2.1.
> We could even start on gnugp-2.1 now for arches where its ready, but its
> cleaner to do them all at once.

strictly speaking (and maybe somewhat pedantically) I don't expect marking 2.1 stable at all; when it is considered stable from upstream 2.2 will be released and that will be the first candidate for stable branch in Gentoo as well from my point of view. 2.0 is EOL december 2017
Comment 14 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2015-11-18 09:32:25 UTC
ia64 stable
Comment 15 Kristian Fiskerstrand gentoo-dev Security 2015-11-30 20:35:51 UTC
ping for sparc
Comment 16 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2016-02-13 15:15:04 UTC
(In reply to Kristian Fiskerstrand from comment #15)
> ping for sparc

reping for sparc, can we get this one out of the way please :)
Comment 17 Aaron Bauman Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2016-07-24 02:30:32 UTC
@sparc, ping.
Comment 18 Kristian Fiskerstrand gentoo-dev Security 2016-08-06 20:20:06 UTC
Obsoleting this one, gnupg 2.1.14 will require npth 1.2 which I'll
file a new bug for