556334 – x11-misc/zim-0.63 version bump

Bug 556334 - x11-misc/zim-0.63 version bump

Summary: x11-misc/zim-0.63 version bump

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 556332

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Desktop Misc. Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2015-07-30 16:29 UTC by Jonas Stein
Modified:	2015-08-03 20:18 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
zim-0.63.ebuild as tested on amd64 (zim-0.63.ebuild,1.83 KB, text/plain) 2015-07-30 16:30 UTC, Jonas Stein	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Jonas Stein gentoo-dev

2015-07-30 16:29:13 UTC

* patch for .desktop file is not needed anymore
* ebuild attached and tested on amd64 
* BTW: the .po files are BSD licensed, should we add BSD to LICENSE?

please find the ebuild in the attachment

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Jonas Stein gentoo-dev

2015-07-30 16:30:33 UTC

Created attachment 408000 [details]
zim-0.63.ebuild as tested on amd64

Comment 2 Jonas Stein gentoo-dev

2015-07-30 21:25:40 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 556332 ***

Comment 3 Sebastian Pipping gentoo-dev

2015-08-03 20:18:51 UTC

(In reply to Jonas Stein from comment #0)
> * BTW: the .po files are BSD licensed, should we add BSD to LICENSE?

Yes.  Also, GPL-2 should be GPL-2+.

With the translations, only zh_TW does not have its own license header.  The others claim to be licensed under the same licence as "the package" which would be GPL 2 or later.  So in a way we seem to have contradicting claims here.  if you get a chance to talk to upstream about it, that would be cool.


+  03 Aug 2015; Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org> zim-0.61.ebuild,
+  zim-0.62.ebuild:
+  Fix license according to README.txt (bug #556334)
+