> On Tuesday 22 June 2004 04:13 am, Guy Martin wrote: > > That's how I see it for most packages. The script I coded > > (http://dev.gentoo.org/~gmsoft/tools/imlate) checks stable version of > > a packages on a given arch against the stable version on another arch > > (x86 per default). > > dude that is -awesome-. i would love to see something like this in > gentoolkit-dev. :) > > i'd also like to see a better version of my revision checking script, which > will compare a currently installed ebuild with the version in portage and > tell you if they differ. i wrote it because i got annoyed while trying to fix > a package... apparently the bug was in a package it depended on. one that was > already fixed without revision bumping because the bug only effected amd64. > >_< but i have a -lot- more work to do on revcheck before it's generally > usable (and ignores changes we dont care about). > my initial version: http://dev.gentoo.org/~lv/revcheck.sh > the version ecatmur fixed up to have overlay support: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~lv/revcheck2.sh > > i'd love to know how many of these insanely useful tools are out there, just > not in general use. i know for sure imlate is going into my personal > toolbox. :) > > > -- > > Travis Tilley <lv@gentoo.org> bug filed and assigned as suggested. thanks :)
ping?
This bug appears to been lost. tools-portage: re-assign to yourself if you think it's relative still, else close.
Hey, Just added an imlate script http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoolkit/trunk/gentoolkit-dev/src/imlate/ Needs to be tested until it hits the tree.
gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.11 has been released and an imlate script has been included. The imlate script you pointed out doesn't work for me, no results. So for any feature request and/or bug report regarding imlate file a new bug please. If you still have the revcheck.sh please file a new bug/feature request and/or send me your script idl0r@gentoo.org. Thanks and sorry for the delay. :)
