enum34 is a new runtime dep to the bumped cryptography-0.7
You forgot to bump cryptography-0.7?
~arm added
Marked ~hppa.
bump ppc ppc64 Bump to pyopenssl-0.15.1 requires >=dev-python/cryptography-0.7 which either needs ppc ppc64 dropping again or awaiting addition from here. If it had its own bug it would be "Blocks:" 2 bugs 04 Apr 2015; Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> cryptography-0.6.1.ebuild, cryptography-0.7.1-r1.ebuild, cryptography-0.7.2.ebuild, cryptography-0.8.1.ebuild, cryptography-0.8.ebuild: Add arm64/ia64/m68k/s390/sh love.
(In reply to Ian Delaney from comment #4) > bump ppc ppc64 > Bump to pyopenssl-0.15.1 requires >=dev-python/cryptography-0.7 which either > needs ppc ppc64 dropping again or awaiting addition from here. If it had > its own bug it would be "Blocks:" 2 bugs You should probably put it in the tree then, and drop keywords as appropriate. > 04 Apr 2015; Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> cryptography-0.6.1.ebuild, > cryptography-0.7.1-r1.ebuild, cryptography-0.7.2.ebuild, > cryptography-0.8.1.ebuild, cryptography-0.8.ebuild: > Add arm64/ia64/m68k/s390/sh love. What does this have to do with anything? Pressuring volunteers doesn't do what you think it does.
Marked ~ppc64.
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #5) > > You should probably put it in the tree then, and drop keywords as > appropriate. > right. Perfectly correct and I shall consider it however I prefer it being added, saving dropping keywords which I deplore. > > 04 Apr 2015; Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> cryptography-0.6.1.ebuild, > > cryptography-0.7.1-r1.ebuild, cryptography-0.7.2.ebuild, > > cryptography-0.8.1.ebuild, cryptography-0.8.ebuild: > > Add arm64/ia64/m68k/s390/sh love. > > What does this have to do with anything? idella4@gentoo.org 2015-04-23 11:57:04 UTC CC ia64@gentoo.org which was always there for the observing. Being a long term observer of these things I 'presumed' you would have observed it. vapier merely appears to have missed removing ia64 from CC on committing the above. This was intended as a qualifier to the above. Before I noticed it I was considering adding ia64 to bump ppc ppc64 > Pressuring volunteers doesn't do that you think it does. Oh is that what I was doing? a bump is a reminder, a prompt in case it may have been overlooked or the value of it being attended to has been increase. You, it appears, call it pressuring.
keyworded ~ppc. closing.
Re-opening, adding sparc as dev-python/enum34 is needed for app-portage/eloviewer-2.5 for python <3.4
I see enum34 is keyworded sparc, removing sparc@, closing bug
