Bug 529494 – =dev-python/pyspf-2.0.11: stabilization request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Michael Orlitzky 2014-11-16 14:45:53 UTC]

Can we please stabilize this one? I'd like to stabilize the latest pypolicyd-spf that depends on it. We run it all day every day on our mail servers, works as advertised.

*pyspf-2.0.10 (29 Sep 2014)

  29 Sep 2014; Ian Delaney <[e-mail]> +pyspf-2.0.10.ebuild,
  -pyspf-2.0.5.ebuild, -pyspf-2.0.6.ebuild, -pyspf-2.0.7-r1.ebuild,
  -pyspf-2.0.8-r1.ebuild, -pyspf-2.0.8.ebuild:
  bump; update, fine tune deps, rm old

[Comment 1 Dirkjan Ochtman (RETIRED) 2014-11-16 14:59:05 UTC]

Sure. Arches, please go ahead.

[Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-12-04 11:30:41 UTC]

  dependency.bad                22
   dev-python/pyspf/pyspf-2.0.10.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-python/pydns:2[python_targets_python2_7(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]']

[Comment 3 Michael Orlitzky 2014-12-04 12:19:06 UTC]

I guess the problem is,

  $(python_gen_cond_dep 'dev-python/pydns:2[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]' python2_7)

in pyspf?

The stable version of pydns:2 works fine with python-2.7, but it's using the old distutils and doesn't have any of the magic USE flags.

Maybe the simplest thing to do is stabilize pydns-2.3.6-r1 first?

[Comment 4 Thomas Oettli 2015-01-23 07:58:31 UTC]

Upstream has released version 2.0.11, two bugs where fixed. One of them causes false-positives during SPF checks.

CHANGELOG:

Version 2.0.11 - December 5, 2014
  * Fix another bug in SPF record parsing that caused records with terms
    separated by multple spaces as invalid, but they are fine per the ABNF
  * Downcase names in additional answers returned by DNS before adding
    to cache, since case inconsistency can cause PTR match failures (initial
    patch thanks to Joni Fieggen) and other problems.


I renamed the ebuild to pyspf-2.0.11.ebuild which worked fine for me.

Due to this critical bugs, please bump to pyspf-2.0.11 and stabilize
that version.

[Comment 5 Michael Orlitzky 2015-01-23 22:33:25 UTC]

(In reply to Thomas Oettli from comment #4)
> Upstream has released version 2.0.11, two bugs where fixed. One of them
> causes false-positives during SPF checks.

Thanks, the arches aren't CCed on this yet, so I made it depend on the version bump and updated the description.

[Comment 6 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2015-01-25 09:47:31 UTC]

(In reply to Michael Orlitzky from comment #5)
> (In reply to Thomas Oettli from comment #4)
> > Upstream has released version 2.0.11, two bugs where fixed. One of them
> > causes false-positives during SPF checks.
> 
> Thanks, the arches aren't CCed on this yet, so I made it depend on the
> version bump and updated the description.

*pyspf-2.0.11 (25 Jan 2015)

  25 Jan 2015; Ian Delaney <[e-mail]> +pyspf-2.0.11.ebuild,
  -pyspf-2.0.9.ebuild:
  bump; rm old

Please explain

[Comment 7 Michael Orlitzky 2015-01-29 01:04:58 UTC]

(In reply to Ian Delaney from comment #6)
> 
> Please explain

I meant that, since the arches haven't been CCed yet, it won't hurt anything to change the bug description and stabilize the new version instead after bug #532318 is fixed.

[Comment 8 Michael Orlitzky 2015-05-21 15:01:07 UTC]

Adding arches now that pydns is stable.

[Comment 9 Agostino Sarubbo 2015-09-24 10:58:08 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 10 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2015-10-06 13:34:52 UTC]

x86 stable