Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 523066 - app-editors/nano would be removed from a freshly installed system by "emerge --depclean"
Summary: app-editors/nano would be removed from a freshly installed system by "emerge ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 375115
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-09-17 20:12 UTC by Toralf Förster
Modified: 2014-09-17 23:47 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Toralf Förster gentoo-dev 2014-09-17 20:12:42 UTC
At 2 different fresh installed systems (x86 and amd64) I experienced, that nano would be removed :


# emerge --depclean --ask --quiet


!!! 'app-editors/nano' (virtual/editor) is part of your system profile.
!!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your system.

app-editors/nano: 2.3.2 none none
sys-kernel/vanilla-sources: 3.16.3 none 3.16.2

All selected packages: app-editors/nano-2.3.2 sys-kernel/vanilla-sources-3.16.3
Would you like to unmerge these packages? [Yes/No] No

Quitting.

Packages installed:   244
Packages in world:    38
Packages in system:   44
Required packages:    242
Number to remove:     2





Is nano by accident not in the world file (2 different minimal ISO images at different days used !) ?
Comment 1 Ben Kohler gentoo-dev 2014-09-17 20:16:22 UTC
It's not supposed to be in @world, it's required by virtual/editor in @system.  Did you install another editor which satisfies virtual/editor? You can check with "portageq expand_virtual / virtual/editor"
Comment 2 Toralf Förster gentoo-dev 2014-09-17 20:28:37 UTC
yep, at the amd64 I get :

$ portageq expand_virtual / virtual/editor
app-editors/nano


and yes, first thing is often to install vim for me.
Comment 3 Ben Kohler gentoo-dev 2014-09-17 20:34:13 UTC
If you have vim, then you shouldn't care if nano is removed, presumably. I think this is either "not a bug" or it's a dupe of bug #375115
Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-09-17 23:47:27 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 375115 ***