521196 – dev-python/pythonmagick-0.9.10 - _Image.cpp:118:66: error: no matching function for call to 'boost::python::class_<Magick::Image>::def(const char [17], <unresolved overloaded function type>)'

Bug 521196 - dev-python/pythonmagick-0.9.10 - _Image.cpp:118:66: error: no matching function for call to 'boost::python::class_<Magick::Image>::def(const char [17], <unresolved overloaded function type>)'

Summary: dev-python/pythonmagick-0.9.10 - _Image.cpp:118:66: error: no matching functi...

Status:	RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	[OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Python Gentoo Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	PATCH

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2014-08-26 23:02 UTC by Martin von Gagern
Modified:	2015-07-28 14:22 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Disambiguate method (disambiguate-floodFillOpacity.patch,1.42 KB, patch) 2014-08-26 23:02 UTC, Martin von Gagern	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Martin von Gagern 2014-08-26 23:02:18 UTC

Created attachment 383770 [details, diff]
Disambiguate method

PythonMagick-0.9.10/pythonmagick_src/_Image.cpp:118:66: error: no matching function for call to 'boost::python::class_<Magick::Image>::def(const char [17], <unresolved overloaded function type>)'
         .def("floodFillOpacity", &Magick::Image::floodFillOpacity)
                                                                  ^
This seems like a reincarnation of bug #500414: now the floodFillOpacity member has been overloaded and needs an explicit cast. At least for my media-gfx/imagemagick-6.8.9.7.

The ambiguity was apparently introduced in http://trac.imagemagick.org/changeset/16167 so I'd say the original version should be the one which accepts a PaintMethod argument.

Comment 1 Zsolti 2014-08-28 09:45:52 UTC

can confirm this.

Comment 2 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2015-07-28 14:22:23 UTC

Does this still happen with 0.9.11 or 0.9.12?