Created attachment 382126 [details, diff] patch against gx86 version Changes: - prefixed paths in enable-fs-paths-extra - explicitly specify libdir util-linux contain some auto-magic, which fails if --libdir is explicitly specified and does NOT start with /usr, '${prefix}' or '${exec_prefix}': <https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/pull/109> libdir='${prefix}/'"$(get_libdir)" doesn't change anything from our defaults.
enable-fs-paths-extra is fine i'm not groking why libdir is needed ... isn't this the same as the default ?
(In reply to SpanKY from comment #1) > enable-fs-paths-extra is fine > > i'm not groking why libdir is needed ... isn't this the same as the default ? util-linux configure's contains: AS_CASE([$libdir], ['${exec_prefix}/'* | '${prefix}/'* | /usr/*], [usrlib_execdir=$libdir], [usrlib_execdir='${exec_prefix}'$libdir] ) AC_SUBST([usrlib_execdir]) It basically means that $libdir is consider as a sub-directory if is don't match '${exec_prefix}/'* | '${prefix}/'* | /usr/*. So for normal installs (prefix=/usr/*) everything is fine, but for prefix one ends up with a double prefix. prefix=${EPREFIX}/usr && libdir= ${EPREFIX}/lib-> libdir=${EPREFIX}/usr/$libidr = ${EPREFIX}/usr/${EPREFIX}/lib libdir='${prefix}/'"$(get_libdir)" works around that issue. libdir=$(get_libdir) would work, too.
ok, should add a comment above the econf else it might get cleaned up # We manually set --libdir to the default since on prefix, econf will set it to # a value which the configure script does not recognize. This makes it set the # usrlib_execdir to a bad value.
+ 05 Aug 2014; Christoph Junghans <ottxor@gentoo.org> util-linux-2.24.2.ebuild: + added prefix support (bug #518898) + BTW <https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/pull/109> got merged, so we can drop the --libdir hack for >2.25 (noted in the comment!)
*** Bug 489730 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
