Part of emul-linux-x86-baselibs. Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 361152 [details, diff] emul-linux-x86-baselibs-20131008-r5.ebuild.patch
Created attachment 361154 [details, diff] emul-linux-x86-baselibs_files_remove-native4.patch
Created attachment 361156 [details, diff] openssl-1.0.1e-r1.ebuild.patch
Can we get this merged please?
Doesn't quite work as-is, needs gmp built with abi_x86_32, but doesn't depend as such, resulting in: + x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -m32 -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1 _ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -O2 -pipe -fno-s trict-aliasing -Wa,--noexecstack -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wl,-soname=libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -o libcry pto.so.1.0.0 -Wl,--whole-archive libcrypto.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -L. -lgmp -ldl -lz /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64 -pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3/../../../libgmp.so when searching for -lgmp /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libgmp.so when searching for -lgmp /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lgmp collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Probably needs to depend on a few other 32bit things.
Created attachment 367068 [details, diff] openssl-1.0.1e-r3.ebuild.patch Here's the patch updated to apply vs -r3 in portage, and includes the USE dependencies to get GMP in abi_x86_32 Works for me. Note; Needed a bit of munging because the existing code had a string replace that removed the string "[static-libs(+)]" from the LIB_DEPS string, and this of course failed when the source string became [static-libs(+), ] in 2 places. So I did what seemed logical and just split it into 2 variables.
Created attachment 367086 [details, diff] openssl-1.0.1e-r3.ebuild.patch (In reply to Kent Fredric from comment #6) > Created attachment 367068 [details, diff] [details, diff] > openssl-1.0.1e-r3.ebuild.patch > > Here's the patch updated to apply vs -r3 in portage, and includes the USE > dependencies to get GMP in abi_x86_32 > > Works for me. Actually your were looking (and it was missing in the ebuild) for ${MULTILIB_USEDEP} :) > > Note; Needed a bit of munging because the existing code had a string replace > that removed the string "[static-libs(+)]" from the LIB_DEPS string, and > this of course failed when the source string became [static-libs(+), ] in 2 > places. > > So I did what seemed logical and just split it into 2 variables. I don't know why this dependencies where set in this way, but maybe it's just old cruft.. I've changed it to use static-libs? in zlib and gmp. This turns on static-libs in zlib and gmp if openssl is build with "static-libs" Furthermore i've also added a DOCS variable instead of dodoc. I've also moved the sed commend from src_unpack() to src_prepare() and killed src_unpack. I don't know why it was there and there might be a reason for it - if it was wrong feel free to update my patch again - however openssl builds fine :) BTW, i've add the MULTILIB_USEDEP to mit-krb5 too, however this one isn't ported yet. Unless it doesn't need 32bit mit-krb5 for multilib it's actually broken for multilib and needs to be ported first. Another way would be disabling kerberos for multilib. After all, this is quite a big ebuild and i'm pretty sure it needs more work..
*** Bug 504206 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 376318 [details, diff] openssl-1.0.1g.ebuild.patch Updated patch for the latest openssl version.
To get things moving a little faster, I've decided to commit openssl first and leave mit-krb5 support pending till it is converted as well. +*openssl-1.0.2_beta1-r3 (12 May 2014) + + 12 May 2014; Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> +openssl-1.0.2_beta1-r3.ebuild: + Introduce multilib support, bug #488418. Since this is keyword-free beta, I leave up to maintainers to decide how to move that into mainline. I can backport the patch if desired, or we can supposedly unmask it along with 1.0.2. @iamnr3: could you explain all those headers you put in MULTILIB_WRAPPED_HEADERS? It seems to me that only openssl/opensslconf.h is necessary.
> @iamnr3: could you explain all those headers you put in > MULTILIB_WRAPPED_HEADERS? It seems to me that only openssl/opensslconf.h is > necessary. Hmm, i can't even remember looking at the Header files for openssl. I'm pretty sure i've just used the patches from Reinis Danne or Kent Fredric and updated those for newer versions + added the changes which i mentioned in the comments.
