Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 485234 - sys-kernel/genkernel-next-35 stable request
Summary: sys-kernel/genkernel-next-35 stable request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Fabio Erculiani (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on: 486636 487674 487676 488046 498446
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-09-17 19:27 UTC by Pacho Ramos
Modified: 2014-06-22 20:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-09-17 19:27:41 UTC
This is for tracking purposes to ensure we have a genkernel-next version stabilized before Gnome 3.8

Thanks
Comment 1 Fabio Erculiani (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-09-18 19:21:42 UTC
I don't see any problem with that. 24-r1 can go stable for me.
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-09-28 09:53:20 UTC
Probably -27 will be a better candidate :/
Comment 3 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-10-11 17:39:29 UTC
Fabio, any problem with CCing arches for latest version? Looks like it includes interesting fixes over older version tagged for stabilization

Thanks
Comment 4 Fabio Erculiani (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-10-11 17:40:19 UTC
Feel free to go ahead
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-11-09 17:25:03 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-11-30 16:24:01 UTC
See bug 488046 #comment #3.
Comment 7 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-12-07 22:38:47 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 8 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-01-18 09:21:12 UTC
Just seen bug 498446 will also be needed ;)
Comment 9 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-01-18 19:27:14 UTC
+  18 Jan 2014; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> genkernel-next-35.ebuild:
+  ia64 stable, bug #485234 (thanks to Emeric Maschino for testing)
+
Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2014-02-02 09:59:30 UTC
I can test only with a compilation. If it is enough I can mark stable (like I said for systemd)
Comment 11 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-02-02 10:03:04 UTC
I would go ahead, I doubt it will add important regressions over old genkernel (for example, in the case of HPPA, looks like it was "as wrong" as old genkernel)
Comment 12 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-03-08 11:43:20 UTC
Well, we already point in docs to systemd profiles, also explain the problems with old genkernel and also point to this alternative. Also the old genkernel is hardmasked in systemd profiles and, then, I guess people wanting to use genkernel on this arches will try to unmask genkernel-next and try it :|
Comment 13 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-06-22 14:35:15 UTC
Keyworded on alpha.
Comment 14 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-06-22 20:18:07 UTC
This bug is obsoleted by bug 506888