Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 473398 - app-text/yagf: drop cuneiform support
Summary: app-text/yagf: drop cuneiform support
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 421717
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-06-15 20:12 UTC by Pacho Ramos
Modified: 2017-07-23 10:42 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-06-15 20:12:29 UTC
As it needs to be dropped due bug 421717

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Richard Freeman gentoo-dev 2013-06-15 20:21:36 UTC
Not sure I follow.  I can understand the need to mask cuneiform, but why is it necessary to drop support in other apps?  The overflow cannot end up on anybody's system unless they unmask it.  The flag can certainly be non-default to avoid pulling in a masked dependency.
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-06-15 20:39:41 UTC
If cuneiform will be removed, yagf will not be able to depend on it, or am I missing anything? :/
Comment 3 Sergey Popov gentoo-dev 2013-06-16 06:46:48 UTC
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #2)
> If cuneiform will be removed, yagf will not be able to depend on it, or am I
> missing anything? :/

According to ebuild, yagf has an OPTIONAL dependency on cuneiform via 'cuneiform' USE-flag. I think that just masking this USE-flag will do the trick :-)

Default OCR engine for yagf in Gentoo is tesseract, so it would not be a problem.

P.S. By the way - it has been already masked:

# Richard Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> (24 Mar 2013)
# Dependency is masked for buffer overflows for now
app-text/yagf cuneiform


So, i close this as WONTFIX for now. If app-text/cuneiform will be a candidate for lastrite, please reopen.
Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-06-16 08:25:58 UTC
(In reply to Sergey Popov from comment #3)
> So, i close this as WONTFIX for now. If app-text/cuneiform will be a
> candidate for lastrite, please reopen.

It is (treecleaners are CCed to clean it)
Comment 5 Richard Freeman gentoo-dev 2013-06-16 09:50:37 UTC
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #4)
> (In reply to Sergey Popov from comment #3)
> > So, i close this as WONTFIX for now. If app-text/cuneiform will be a
> > candidate for lastrite, please reopen.
> 
> It is (treecleaners are CCed to clean it)

It was a treecleaner candidate.  It is not at present, though that may change in the future.  It is not currently masked for removal, but rather it is masked with the hope that the issue can be fixed...