Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 468108 - dev-lang/gnat-gcc with sys-apps/texinfo-5.1 - .../work/gcc-[..]/gcc/ada/gnat-style.texi:45: unknown command `hfill' / / make[3]: *** [doc/gnat-style.info] Error 1
Summary: dev-lang/gnat-gcc with sys-apps/texinfo-5.1 - .../work/gcc-[..]/gcc/ada/gnat-...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: ada team [OBSOLETE]
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/201...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 476726 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: texinfo-5.1
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-05-01 10:09 UTC by Ladislav Laska
Modified: 2013-08-02 17:49 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ladislav Laska 2013-05-01 10:09:56 UTC 
The gnat-gcc fails to build with texinfo-5.1. This seems to be an gcc doc issue, as in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00966.html . A patch should be issued or texinfo-5.1 blocked.
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-13 21:03:51 UTC 
*** Bug 476726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 George Shapovalov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-08-01 13:08:39 UTC 
Hm, the patch does not seem to apply directly and digging in referenced files shows that they are different. Will have to do it the hard way..
Comment 3 George Shapovalov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-08-02 17:49:08 UTC 
Ok, the failures are different from those in the referenced gcc post; the files are different too. Rather than hunting all these failures I added <texinfo-5.1 to DEPEND. A better course of action would be to stabilize newer gnatgcc. 

However, if this becomes a problem (say, >=texinfo-5.1 becomes needed for some core package), this bug can be revisited. An actually working patch would be wellcome at this point :).
Closing for now.