Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 455866 - sys-apps/gawk - man/texi translation into Russian
Summary: sys-apps/gawk - man/texi translation into Russian
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-02-06 15:55 UTC by Vladimir Romanov (RETIRED)
Modified: 2013-02-08 08:04 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Vladimir Romanov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-02-06 15:55:37 UTC
Not long time ago, i joined a translationproject.org for Russian translation, and choose gawk. Now i translating a .pot file and will end today or tomorrow. I contacted FSF and asked, can i translate also .texi doc and man page of gawk. FSF answered, that
- They do not have any procedure of man pages translating (and, in fact, they have none translated yet for GNU products)
- I can translate .texi, so it will be included in gawk, but only if i sign the paper, that i give all rights to FSF, send it via postmail to them, then receive one copy back. Sigh! I hate lawyers, and, postmail too, by the way.

Why i can simply file a bug here with translated man, and it is comitted, but i can't do that in FSF?

So, question: if i can't do that in gawk itself, can we update translated man or texi as a patch to gawk ebuild. Yes, so it will be accessible only in Gentoo, but... it's my distro :).

If someone could somehow include .texi and man in gawk itself, i will give a translations to that person.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2013-02-08 08:04:43 UTC
sorry, but no.  i don't want to carry translations for every package that someone processes but doesn't want to send upstream.

while it's true that generally the umbrella GNU project discourages man pages, it's up to the individual project to decide whether to carry them.