portpeek 2.1.4, 2.1.6 show the same behaviour: # portpeek -rkqt Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 1350, in <module> get_recursive_info(USER_CONFIG_PATH + "/package.keywords") File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 409, in get_recursive_info get_recursive_info(filename+os.path.sep+file_name) File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 411, in get_recursive_info get_info(filename) File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 434, in get_info diffs_found = parse_line(line, filename) File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 215, in parse_line check_tilde_masked_pkg(check_pkg, filename) File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 764, in check_tilde_masked_pkg if (is_pkg_package_masked(str(current_package.cpv))): File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 635, in is_pkg_package_masked for mask_reason_list in portage.getmaskingstatus(cpv, settings2, portdb=portdb2): File "/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/package/ebuild/getmaskingstatus.py", line 41, in getmaskingstatus mreason in _getmaskingstatus(mycpv, settings, portdb,myrepo)] File "/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/package/ebuild/getmaskingstatus.py", line 57, in _getmaskingstatus metadata = dict(zip(db_keys, portdb.aux_get(mycpv, db_keys, myrepo=myrepo))) File "/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/dbapi/porttree.py", line 460, in aux_get raise KeyError(mycpv) KeyError: 'dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12' Checking for mariadb, the currently installed package seems to have been dropped from portage: $ equery l -iop mariadb * Searching for mariadb ... [-P-] [ ~] dev-db/mariadb-5.1.66:0 [I--] [??] dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12:0 [-P-] [M~] dev-db/mariadb-5.2.13:0 [-P-] [M~] dev-db/mariadb-5.3.11:0 [-P-] [ ~] dev-db/mariadb-5.5.28a:0 Changing the entry from ~dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12 to =dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12 is a workaround: # portpeek -rkqt Package: =dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12 not found. Please check /etc/portage/package.keywords/stabletransition to validate entry portpeek-2.1.1 is fine making the following output: # portpeek -rkqt dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12 has no masked versions : /etc/portage/package.keywords/stabletransition
Another one (again, 2.1.1 is fine), this time without tilde involved, but probably the same cause: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 1350, in <module> get_recursive_info(USER_CONFIG_PATH + "/package.keywords") File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 409, in get_recursive_info get_recursive_info(filename+os.path.sep+file_name) File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 411, in get_recursive_info get_info(filename) File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 434, in get_info diffs_found = parse_line(line, filename) File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 278, in parse_line stable = check_for_stable_release(current_package) File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 691, in check_for_stable_release if not is_pkg_package_masked(str(pkg.cpv)): File "/usr/bin/portpeek", line 635, in is_pkg_package_masked for mask_reason_list in portage.getmaskingstatus(cpv, settings2, portdb=portdb2): File "/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/package/ebuild/getmaskingstatus.py", line 41, in getmaskingstatus mreason in _getmaskingstatus(mycpv, settings, portdb,myrepo)] File "/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/package/ebuild/getmaskingstatus.py", line 57, in _getmaskingstatus metadata = dict(zip(db_keys, portdb.aux_get(mycpv, db_keys, myrepo=myrepo))) File "/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/dbapi/porttree.py", line 460, in aux_get raise KeyError(mycpv) KeyError: 'dev-java/icedtea-7.2.3.3' $ grep icedtea /etc/portage/package.keywords/stabletransition =dev-java/icedtea-7.2.3* $ equery l -ipo icedtea * Searching for icedtea ... [-P-] [ ~] dev-java/icedtea-6.1.11.5:6 [-P-] [ ~] dev-java/icedtea-6.1.12.0:6 [--O] [ ~] dev-java/icedtea-7.2.0-r3:7 [--O] [ ~] dev-java/icedtea-7.2.1:7 [I--] [??] dev-java/icedtea-7.2.3.3:7 [-P-] [ ] dev-java/icedtea-7.2.3.4:7
Can't replicate this at all. What python version are you using?
post emerge --info, please
Created attachment 338020 [details] emerge.info ...and here it is. :)
Which python version is active?
# eselect python list Available Python interpreters: [1] python2.7 [2] python3.2 *
Thanks. Can you add d to the command, maybe some debug output might be helpful.
Created attachment 338278 [details] output of portpeek -rqktd done!
Created attachment 338426 [details] more output of portpeek -rqktd here it is failing at '<dev-util/cmake-2.8.10.9'
ok, got to replicate this. I am working on it.
Can you try 2.1.7 when it hits the tree?
OK, had to reintroduce mariadb-5.2.12 to portage, removed the ebuild after emerge, and made sure that portpeek-2.1.6 would stumble over it again. When the package.keywords entry reads `~dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12`, portpeek-2.1.7 reports: dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12 has no masked versions : /etc/portage/package.keywords/stabletransition When it's `=dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12`, the output is: Package: =dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12 not found. Please check /etc/portage/package.keywords/stabletransition to validate entry
Created attachment 341390 [details] portpeek-2.1.7-rktdn log new debug output with ~dev-db/mariadb-5.2.12
only the versions 2.0.25 2.1.9 2.1.18 ~2.1.19 ~2.1.20 are left in the tree. Is there any progress with this bug? Does it still exist in the recent versions?
I could never replicate. Unless the OP responds, we can close this and he/she can reopen with test data and version info and I will address it then.
Please reopen with test and version info if this is still an issue.
