Can we get the ball rolling on stabilizing 1.9.2? dev-db/postgis-2.0.3 will need it soon.
I'm submitting sci-libs/gdal-1.9.2 for stabilization as it is reported as working for users, no response from any dev on sci-geosciences, this holds up PostGIS 2.0.3 from being stabled, and 1.9.2 apparently fixes other bugs open against it. Target for stabilization: =sci-libs/gdal-1.9.2
dependency.bad 18 sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['dev-libs/freexl'] sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['dev-libs/freexl']
(In reply to comment #3) > dependency.bad 18 > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) > ['dev-libs/freexl'] > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) > ['dev-libs/freexl'] > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) > ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) > ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['dev-libs/freexl'] > > sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: RDEPEND: > amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['dev-libs/freexl'] I can't reproduce any of this.
(In reply to comment #4) > I can't reproduce any of this. The repoman warning is the same for all. ~ $ grep "dev-libs/freexl" /usr/portage/sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild xls? ( dev-libs/freexl )
amd64 stable
x86 stable
For ppc and ppc64 we need to stabilize =dev-db/spatialite-3.0.1 first, because sci-libs/gdal-1.9.2[spatialite] depends on it. The problem is that dev-db/spatialite doesn't compile on ppc and ppc64, at least in my boxes. =dev-db/spatialite-3.0.1 has ppc and ppc64 keywords but =dev-db/spatialite-2.4.0_rc4 not. I tried to compile 2.4.0_rc4 and fails to compile in the same manner as 3.0.1, so maybe it was a mistake when the ppc and ppc64 keywords were added to the 3.0.1 ebuild. If I'm right I would sugest to remove ppc and ppc64 keyword on spatialite-3.0.1 ebuild and add 'dev-db/spatialite spatialite' to profiles/arch/powerpc/package.use.mask
Created attachment 345374 [details] spatialite-3.0.1 build log
Created attachment 345376 [details] spatialite-3.0.1 build log
dependency.bad 20 sci-libs/gdal/gdal-1.9.2.ebuild: DEPEND: ppc(default/linux/powerpc/ppc32/13.0) ['dev-db/spatialite']
Sorry, I mean add "sci-libs/gdal spatialite" to profiles/arch/powerpc/package.use.mask
(In reply to comment #12) > Sorry, I mean add "sci-libs/gdal spatialite" to > profiles/arch/powerpc/package.use.mask done
ppc stable
ppc64 stable. Last arch, closing