447492 – net-wireless/aircrack-ng does not respect AR/RANLIB

Bug 447492 - net-wireless/aircrack-ng does not respect AR/RANLIB

Summary: net-wireless/aircrack-ng does not respect AR/RANLIB

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:	tc-directly
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2012-12-16 16:45 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified:	2012-12-16 20:29 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev

2012-12-16 16:45:14 UTC

You receive this bug because this package does not respect my system's AR/RANLIB ( x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar - /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar | x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib - /usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib ) and calls directly ar - /usr/bin/ar | ranlib - /usr/bin/ranlib
The possible solutions to fix this issue are:
1)Fix the buildsystem, if you can
2)inherit toolchain-funcs and use tc-export AR RANLIB
3)inherit toolchain-funcs and use emake AR="$(tc-getAR)" RANLIB="$(tc-getRANLIB)"


ar cru libosdep.a  osdep.o network.o linux.o linux_tap.o radiotap/radiotap-parser.o common.o
ranlib libosdep.a

Comment 1 Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-12-16 19:23:40 UTC

aircrack-ng-1.1-r3 added.
Thanks.

Comment 2 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev

2012-12-16 20:25:11 UTC

I am upstream for this project but not really sure what would be needed to fix the makefile.  If you are willing to write a patch for it I will happily add it.

Comment 3 Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-12-16 20:29:12 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> I am upstream for this project but not really sure what would be needed to
> fix the makefile.  If you are willing to write a patch for it I will happily
> add it.

Oh... no need for patch... I would have sent one if needed.

Thanks!