431036 – dev-lisp/sbcl fails tests: SB-POSIX-TESTS::READDIR.1,

Bug 431036 - dev-lisp/sbcl fails tests: SB-POSIX-TESTS::READDIR.1,

Summary: dev-lisp/sbcl fails tests: SB-POSIX-TESTS::READDIR.1,

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 427616

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	AMD64 Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Panagiotis Christopoulos (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2012-08-12 06:10 UTC by neko259
Modified:	2014-04-27 15:12 UTC (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
log.tar.bz2 (log.tar.bz2,290.42 KB, application/x-bzip-compressed-tar) 2012-08-12 06:12 UTC, neko259	Details
emerge --info (info.txt,17.34 KB, text/plain) 2012-08-12 06:12 UTC, neko259	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description neko259 2012-08-12 06:10:57 UTC

When trying to compile sbcl of any version (tried since 1.0.19 to 1.0.55-r1) fails on sb-posix tests for unknown reason.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge sbcl
Actual Results:  
Failing on sb-posix tests.

Expected Results:  
Compiling and installing.

Comment 1 neko259 2012-08-12 06:12:18 UTC

Created attachment 321064 [details]
log.tar.bz2

Comment 2 neko259 2012-08-12 06:12:34 UTC

Created attachment 321066 [details]
emerge --info

Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-08-12 07:32:48 UTC

Please don't change the "Importance: " field. This bug is certainly not 'critical'.

How is sbcl-1.0.57 from bug 422505 (if you are capable of testing) ?

Comment 4 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2012-08-12 07:34:54 UTC

CCing neurogeek@ too despite not being in metadata.xml since he did the last bump to 1.0.55-r1.

Comment 5 neko259 2012-08-12 07:42:55 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> Please don't change the "Importance: " field. This bug is certainly not
> 'critical'.
> 
> How is sbcl-1.0.57 from bug 422505 (if you are capable of testing) ?

I don't see any ebuild in that bug.

Comment 6 RCV 2012-08-30 18:50:48 UTC

I confirm this bug. I can't build sbcl with LANG="ru_RU.UTF-8". I can build sbcl  with LC_ALL="C", but anyway it doesn't work in  my system with LANG="ru_RU.UTF-8".

Comment 7 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2014-04-27 15:12:58 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 427616 ***