Created attachment 307465 [details]
It works for me, maybe it needs some further testing...
scid-vs-pc is a fork of scid chess db. See this suggestion https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410303
Created attachment 307467 [details, diff]
Created attachment 307469 [details, diff]
Also a !games-board/scid-vs-pc line should be added to scid-4.2.2 ebuild
First thing of all: thanks.
I'm a gentoo newbie and maybe my question is trivial but why don't you include this ebuild in the portage main tree? Even as a masked package I mean.
(In reply to comment #4)
> First thing of all: thanks.
> I'm a gentoo newbie and maybe my question is trivial but why don't you
> include this ebuild in the portage main tree? Even as a masked package I
normal users/bug reporters can't do that. A developer has to test it/check it and then merge it to portage tree. (of course masked)
And how can we persuade a developer to do that? Tim Harder (who appears to be a developer...) in this ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410303 ) post suggests to merge scidvspc in the main tree.
Can he at least verify the correct compilation of your ebuild and merge it (tesitng or masked or whatever)? Should I write him directly?