Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 410527 - games-board/scid-vs-pc-4.7 - A free chess database application
Summary: games-board/scid-vs-pc-4.7 - A free chess database application
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL: http://scidvspc.sourceforge.net/
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD, PATCH
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-04-02 10:11 UTC by Godfath3r
Modified: 2018-12-03 12:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
scid-vs-pc.4.7.ebuild (scid-vs-pc-4.7.ebuild,1.87 KB, text/plain)
2012-04-02 10:11 UTC, Godfath3r
Details
files/scid-vs-pc-4.7-gentoo.patch (scid-vs-pc-4.7-gentoo.patch,4.48 KB, patch)
2012-04-02 10:12 UTC, Godfath3r
Details | Diff
files/scid-vs-pc-4.7-qa-warnings.patch (scid-vs-pc-4.7-qa-warnings.patch,497 bytes, patch)
2012-04-02 10:13 UTC, Godfath3r
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Godfath3r 2012-04-02 10:11:31 UTC
Created attachment 307465 [details]
scid-vs-pc.4.7.ebuild

It works for me, maybe it needs some further testing...

scid-vs-pc is a fork of scid chess db. See this suggestion https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410303
Comment 1 Godfath3r 2012-04-02 10:12:41 UTC
Created attachment 307467 [details, diff]
files/scid-vs-pc-4.7-gentoo.patch
Comment 2 Godfath3r 2012-04-02 10:13:28 UTC
Created attachment 307469 [details, diff]
files/scid-vs-pc-4.7-qa-warnings.patch
Comment 3 Godfath3r 2012-04-02 10:19:39 UTC
Also a !games-board/scid-vs-pc line should be added to scid-4.2.2 ebuild
Comment 4 nihil39 2012-04-02 18:39:30 UTC
First thing of all: thanks.
I'm a gentoo newbie and maybe my question is trivial but why don't you include this ebuild in the portage main tree? Even as a masked package I mean.
Comment 5 Godfath3r 2012-04-02 23:46:33 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> First thing of all: thanks.
> I'm a gentoo newbie and maybe my question is trivial but why don't you
> include this ebuild in the portage main tree? Even as a masked package I
> mean.

normal users/bug reporters can't do that. A developer has to test it/check it and then merge it to portage tree. (of course masked)
Comment 6 nihil39 2012-05-12 10:28:17 UTC
And how can we persuade a developer to do that? Tim Harder (who appears to be a developer...) in this ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410303 ) post suggests to merge scidvspc in the main tree. 
Can he at least verify the correct compilation of your ebuild and merge it (tesitng or masked or whatever)? Should I write him directly?