Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 41003 - dev-java packages that lack digest entries (empty SRC_URI)
Summary: dev-java packages that lack digest entries (empty SRC_URI)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-02-09 12:47 UTC by TGL
Modified: 2004-07-17 04:44 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ibm-jdk-1.4.1.patch (ibm-jdk-1.4.1.patch,1.04 KB, patch)
2004-02-09 12:47 UTC, TGL
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description TGL 2004-02-09 12:47:14 UTC
Many dev-java packages don't have there files specified in SRC_URI, thus have empty digests. It makes impossible to detect download corruptions, and creates false positive for distfiles cleaning scripts. I understand it's related to there fetch restriction, but I don't think it is the right way to do it (correct me if i'm wrong). I think a better example is sun-jdk for instance, where file is in SRC_URI, and information about downloading it is in pkg_nofetch() function. Digests are okay in this case.

This is the ebuilds list:

ibm-jdk/ibm-jdk-1.4.1.ebuild
ibm-jre/ibm-jre-1.3.0-r3.ebuild
ibm-jre/ibm-jre-1.3.1-r2.ebuild
ibm-jre/ibm-jre-1.4.1.ebuild
infobus/infobus-1.2.ebuild
jdbc2-oracle/jdbc2-oracle-8.1.7.ebuild
jdbc2-oracle/jdbc2-oracle-9.0.1.4.ebuild
jdbc2-oracle/jdbc2-oracle-9.0.1.ebuild
jdbc2-oracle/jdbc2-oracle-9.2.0.1.ebuild
jdbc2-oracle/jdbc2-oracle-9.2.0.3.ebuild
jdbc3-oracle/jdbc3-oracle-9.2.0.1.ebuild
jdbc3-oracle/jdbc3-oracle-9.2.0.3.ebuild
jrockit/jrockit-8.1.ebuild
sun-j2ee/sun-j2ee-1.3.1.ebuild
sun-j2ee/sun-j2ee-1.3.1-r1.ebuild
sun-j2sdk/sun-j2sdk-1.4.1.ebuild
sun-j2sdk/sun-j2sdk-1.4.1-r1.ebuild
sun-j2sdk/sun-j2sdk-1.4.2.ebuild

I will attach a patch for the first one to make clear what kind of modification i think should be applied. (i may submit more patches later to help on this boring task if you agree on the principle.)

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 TGL 2004-02-09 12:47:54 UTC
Created attachment 25288 [details, diff]
ibm-jdk-1.4.1.patch

A patch example.
Comment 2 Adrian Almenar 2004-02-09 22:42:52 UTC
im working a lot on ibm-jdk to have it well supported on PPC and x86 and have the digests of it fixed.
Comment 3 Chris Aniszczyk (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-17 21:24:11 UTC
Note to self, took care of everything but jdbc and ibm, those are strider's :P (I fear his ebuildfoo in jdbc src_uri ;P)
Comment 4 Chris Aniszczyk (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-03-17 22:44:14 UTC
ibm is cleared out now, only jdbc crap left
Comment 5 Adrian Almenar 2004-03-19 19:05:30 UTC
jdbc is not my package, ask absinthe, i think he put it in portage.
Comment 6 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-28 06:51:44 UTC
Fixed this for dev-java/jrockit. Also, renamed that package to dev-java/jrockit-jdk-bin, as it's full JDK.
Comment 7 Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-07-17 04:44:58 UTC
i fixed the jdbc's ones :\
all gone now