Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 406403 - new ebuild: dev-lua/luvit - asynchronous lua web framework (like nodejs)
Summary: new ebuild: dev-lua/luvit - asynchronous lua web framework (like nodejs)
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Julian Ospald
Depends on: 410337 410339 412015
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2012-03-01 10:37 UTC by Anton Kochkov
Modified: 2013-01-01 16:37 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

luvit-0.2.0.ebuild (luvit-0.2.0.ebuild,1.27 KB, text/plain)
2012-03-01 14:30 UTC, Julian Ospald
0.2.0-makefile.patch (0.2.0-makefile.patch,5.99 KB, patch)
2012-03-01 14:31 UTC, Julian Ospald
Details | Diff
luvit-0.2.0.ebuild (luvit-0.2.0.ebuild,1.14 KB, text/plain)
2012-03-31 17:15 UTC, Julian Ospald
0.2.0-makefile.patch (0.2.0-makefile.patch,8.58 KB, patch)
2012-03-31 17:16 UTC, Julian Ospald
Details | Diff
0.2.0-includes.patch (0.2.0-includes.patch,8.56 KB, patch)
2012-03-31 17:16 UTC, Julian Ospald
Details | Diff
luvit-0.3.1.ebuild (luvit-0.3.1.ebuild,1.12 KB, text/plain)
2012-04-14 17:51 UTC, Julian Ospald
0.3.1-makefile.patch (0.3.1-makefile.patch,5.81 KB, patch)
2012-04-14 17:51 UTC, Julian Ospald
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anton Kochkov 2012-03-01 10:37:17 UTC
Luvit is an attempt to do something crazy by taking node.js' awesome architecture and dependencies and seeing how it fits in the Lua language. 



Latest release 0.2.0:
Comment 1 Julian Ospald 2012-03-01 14:30:37 UTC
Created attachment 303827 [details]

first attempt, please test, because I use "luajit" and "yajl" from the tree for compiling and not the bundled ones.
Comment 2 Julian Ospald 2012-03-01 14:31:15 UTC
Created attachment 303829 [details, diff]

required patch
Comment 3 Anton Kochkov 2012-03-04 19:06:04 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 303829 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> 0.2.0-makefile.patch
> required patch

It works ok, on both x86-32 and x86-64
Comment 4 Julian Ospald 2012-03-31 17:15:16 UTC
added to sunrise-overlay, will be available after svn-review
Comment 5 Julian Ospald 2012-03-31 17:15:48 UTC
Created attachment 307313 [details]
Comment 6 Julian Ospald 2012-03-31 17:16:06 UTC
Created attachment 307315 [details, diff]
Comment 7 Julian Ospald 2012-03-31 17:16:24 UTC
Created attachment 307317 [details, diff]
Comment 8 Julian Ospald 2012-04-14 17:51:10 UTC
Created attachment 308951 [details]
Comment 9 Julian Ospald 2012-04-14 17:51:24 UTC
Created attachment 308953 [details, diff]
Comment 10 Julian Ospald 2012-04-22 15:07:55 UTC

old ones may be broken (tarballs removed)
Comment 11 Dennis Schridde 2012-12-05 11:40:51 UTC
Current version is 0.5.0 according to the website.
Comment 12 Julian Ospald 2012-12-05 12:06:31 UTC
hmm, not sure if I want to import this into the tree, as you can see there is some serious unbundling going on and on top of it one of the dependencies is _very_ fragile. I had to figure out a non-broken commit myself.

however, I'll look at it
Comment 13 Julian Ospald 2012-12-19 17:11:02 UTC
if they merge this, I will consider to add it to portage

but the fixes are non-trivial and I don't want to keep such things around for every version bump
Comment 14 Julian Ospald 2013-01-01 16:37:17 UTC
+*luvit-9999 (01 Jan 2013)
+*luvit-0.6_p20121221 (01 Jan 2013)
+  01 Jan 2013; Julian Ospald <> +luvit-0.6_p20121221.ebuild,
+  +luvit-9999.ebuild:
+  initial import